vciy

CVE-2026-34180

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Heap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing

CVE-2026-341804 of 4 sources documented this
7

rank 7 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 7 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01025  ·  without this subject the record ranks 7

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

no CVSS held by anyone  ·  without this subject the record ranks 7

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 7

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

7 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 7

Hindsight · the state

0.01025EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severitynot scored
Harmnot stated
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-10, 44 days at 0.01, as of 2026-07-24. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

NetScaler ADCpolkitGoogle ChromeESXiMicrosoft Windows34180

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running OpenSSL? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

ReachNo CVSS vector in held sources, so no reach or impact can be stated.
Weakness classCWE-125 Out-of-bounds Readreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-125: Confidentiality: Read Memory; Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in4.0.1; 3.6.3; 3.5.7; 3.4.6; 3.0.21; 1.1.1zh; 1.0.2zqreceipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

Exploit probability0.01025 · top 38% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byopensslreceipt
Recorded changes4 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productOpenSSLreceipt
Published rangesopenssl >= 1.0.2 < 1.0.2zq; openssl >= 1.1.1 < 1.1.1zh; openssl >= 3.0.0 < 3.0.21; openssl >= 3.4.0 < 3.4.6receipt
Show all 7 published ranges
openssl >= 1.0.2 < 1.0.2zq
openssl >= 1.1.1 < 1.1.1zh
openssl >= 3.0.0 < 3.0.21
openssl >= 3.4.0 < 3.4.6
openssl >= 3.5.0 < 3.5.7
openssl >= 3.6.0 < 3.6.3
openssl 4.0.0
Fixed in4.0.1; 3.6.3; 3.5.7; 3.4.6; 3.0.21; 1.1.1zh; 1.0.2zqreceipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Issue summary: Parsing a crafted DER-encoded ASN.1 structure with a primitive element whose content exceeds 2 gigabytes in length may cause a heap buffer over-read on 64-bit Unix and Unix-like platforms. Impact summary: The heap buffer over-read may crash the application (Denial of Service) or to load into the decoded ASN.1 object contents of memory beyond the end of the input buffer. More typically such ASN.1 elements would instead be truncated. An integer truncation in OpenSSL's ASN.1 decoder causes the content length of an ASN.1 primitive element to be mishandled when it exceeds 2 gigabytes. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

In the worst case the truncated length is treated as a request to scan the binary content for a terminating zero byte, possibly causing OpenSSL to read either less than or beyond the end of the allocated buffer. Applications that pass attacker-supplied data to d2i_X509(), d2i_PKCS7(), or any other d2i_* decoding function are affected. OpenSSL's own command-line tools are not vulnerable, as data read through the BIO layer is checked before it reaches the affected code. The issue only affects 64-bit Unix and Unix-like platforms; 32-bit platforms and 64-bit Windows are not affected. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-125
affected versions
openssl >= 1.0.2 < 1.0.2zq; openssl >= 1.1.1 < 1.1.1zh; openssl >= 3.0.0 < 3.0.21; and 4 more, listed in full below
also scored by
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

check it yourself openssl-library.org github.com github.com github.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

10 Jun 20260.00059
15 Jun 20260.00505 · scoring model v2026.06.15
24 Jul 20260.01025
Show all 4 observations
10 Jun 20260.00059
15 Jun 20260.00505
18 Jun 20260.00513
24 Jul 20260.01025

4 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01025Published2026-06-09Index as of2026-07-24

The record had been public for 1 month when this index was last written.

Published 2026-06-09 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-24 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-5777 · NetScaler ADConly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2021-4034 · polkitonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2026-11645 · Google Chromeonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-3055 · NetScaler ADConly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-22226 · ESXionly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-24991 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

9767 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

openssl

Of the 12 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names heap content parsing.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-34180.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.