vciy

CVE-2021-3712

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings

CVE-2021-37124 of 4 sources documented this
52

rank 52 = 23 + 19 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.50445  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.4, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 52

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 42

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 52

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$2.22Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$1.41Mon 2022-04-01, the last material move, 4 years, 3 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$2.22M = $4.99M incident cost x 0.8814887365328109 exposure x 0.50445 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.50445EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.4 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.01294 to 0.50445 across 58 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2016-4523CVE-2014-0160CVE-2016-1646Google ChromeLinux3712

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running OpenSSL? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-125 Out-of-bounds Readreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-125: Confidentiality: Read Memory; Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchopenssl 1.0.2za; openssl 1.1.1l; essbase 11.1.2.4.047; essbase 21.3; epolicy orchestrator 5.10.0; nessus network monitor 6.0.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository, 2026-07-09.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository2026-07-09receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.4 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.50445 · top 1% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth12 products across 7 vendorsderived
Assigned byopensslreceipt
Recorded changes61 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productOpenSSLreceipt
Published rangesopenssl >= 1.0.2 < 1.0.2za; openssl >= 1.1.1 < 1.1.1l; debian linux 9.0; debian linux 10.0receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
openssl >= 1.0.2 < 1.0.2za
openssl >= 1.1.1 < 1.1.1l
debian linux 9.0
debian linux 10.0
debian linux 11.0
netapp e-series santricity os controller >= 11.0 <= 11.50.2
mcafee epolicy orchestrator < 5.10.0
mcafee epolicy orchestrator 5.10.0
tenable nessus network monitor < 6.0.0
tenable.sc >= 5.16.0 <= 5.19.1
oracle essbase < 11.1.2.4.047
oracle essbase >= 21.0 < 21.3
oracle essbase 21.3
oracle mysql connectors <= 8.0.27
oracle mysql enterprise monitor <= 8.0.25
oracle mysql server >= 5.7.0 <= 5.7.35
oracle mysql server >= 8.0.0 <= 8.0.26
oracle mysql workbench <= 8.0.26
oracle peoplesoft enterprise peopletools 8.57
oracle peoplesoft enterprise peopletools 8.58

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-125
affected versions
openssl >= 1.0.2 < 1.0.2za; openssl >= 1.1.1 < 1.1.1l; debian linux 9.0; and 17 more, listed in full below
also scored by
7.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

check it yourself openssl.org git.openssl.org git.openssl.org debian.org lists.apache.org openwall.com +14 morereceipt

Dated events

2022-01-06EPSS moved 0.04 to 0.152026-06-15EPSS moved 0.00 to 0.50

Movement the material steps

25 Aug 20210.01294
6 Jan 20220.15096 · crossed 0.10
4 Feb 20220.3688
1 Apr 20220.0472 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.00262 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.01143 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.50445 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 58 observations
25 Aug 20210.01294
26 Aug 20210.01806
27 Aug 20210.02314
23 Sep 20210.02567
27 Sep 20210.02818
1 Oct 20210.03068
21 Oct 20210.03317
22 Oct 20210.03565
6 Jan 20220.15096
4 Feb 20220.3688
1 Apr 20220.0472
7 Mar 20230.00262
17 Mar 20230.00287
1 Apr 20230.00328
15 Apr 20230.00396
8 Nov 20230.00409
4 Mar 20240.00467
30 Mar 20240.00481
9 May 20240.00411
22 Jun 20240.00352
30 Jul 20240.00487
17 Dec 20240.00522
17 Mar 20250.01143
20 Mar 20250.00844
26 Mar 20250.00748
27 Mar 20250.01014
29 Mar 20250.0328
30 Mar 20250.00748
7 Apr 20250.00844
24 Apr 20250.00748
6 May 20250.00844
15 Jun 20250.00814
10 Jul 20250.00722
16 Jul 20250.00814
30 Jul 20250.01283
8 Aug 20250.01139
17 Aug 20250.0154
22 Aug 20250.01139
21 Sep 20250.01294
1 Oct 20250.00821
8 Oct 20250.00722
27 Oct 20250.01157
28 Oct 20250.00733
30 Oct 20250.00541
10 Nov 20250.00486
18 Nov 20250.045
21 Nov 20250.00486
27 Dec 20250.00768
28 Dec 20250.00486
10 Jan 20260.00541
20 Jan 20260.00486
16 Mar 20260.00413
21 Apr 20260.00561
22 Apr 20260.00413
26 Apr 20260.0046
27 Apr 20260.00523
24 May 20260.0046
15 Jun 20260.50445

58 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.50445Published2021-08-24Public PoC2026-07-09Index as of2026-07-09

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-27 and 2025-03-29 (0.01014 → 0.0328) and the record had been public for 4 years, 10 months when this index was last written.

No material movement in 24 days as of the last ingest this index recorded.

Published 2021-08-24 receipt · Public PoC 2026-07-09 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-09 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2016-4523matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2014-0160matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2014receipt
CVE-2016-1646matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2026-11645 · Google Chromematches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2024-0519 · Google Chromematches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-53150 · Linuxmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

9767 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

openssl

Of the 12 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names overruns processing strings.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2021-3712.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.