vciy

CVE-2025-6543

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Memory overflow vulnerability leading to unintended control flow and Denial of Service

CVE-2025-65434 of 4 sources documented this
77

rank 77 = 40 + 25 + 0 + 6 + 6

rank@v1 · act now

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.10140 · CISA KEV listed  ·  without this subject the record ranks 37

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 52

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 77

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

5 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 71

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

CISA remediation date held  ·  without this subject the record ranks 71

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$506,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$16,900on 2026-08-03, the last material move, 1 month before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$506,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.1014 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.1014EPSSKEV · LISTED
Severity9.2 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationin the wild · KEVreceipt
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-11-21, 298 days at 0.10, as of 2026-09-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

NetScaler ADCCitrix NetScalerMicrosoft WindowsMicrosoftCVE-2017-10002536543

This record is one instance of CWE-119, improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer. The index holds 14296 prior instances of this class, 56 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Citrix9.2 CRITICALreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Scoring standard
CitrixCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running NetScaler ADC? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexity · attack requirements presentreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact on subsequent systemsreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Bufferreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-119: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Modify Memory; Availability, Confidentiality: Read Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource…[email protected]
Ransomware campaign useUnknown to CISAreceipt

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in47.46; 59.19; 37.236receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
CISA remediation statusoverdue since 2025-07-21receipt
CISA required actionApply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.receipt
Published to CISA KEV5 daysderived

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed, 2025-06-30.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 3 public repositories2025-06-26receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed2025-06-30receipt
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA9.2 CRITICALreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.1014 · top 5% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byCitrixreceipt
Recorded changes59 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productNetScaler ADC; NetScaler Gatewayreceipt
Published rangescitrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 13.1 < 13.1-37.236; citrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 13.1 < 13.1-59.19; citrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 14.1 < 14.1-47.46; citrix netscaler gateway >= 13.1 < 13.1-59.19receipt
Show all 5 published ranges
citrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 13.1 < 13.1-37.236
citrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 13.1 < 13.1-59.19
citrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 14.1 < 14.1-47.46
citrix netscaler gateway >= 13.1 < 13.1-59.19
citrix netscaler gateway >= 14.1 < 14.1-47.46
Fixed in47.46; 59.19; 37.236receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Memory overflow vulnerability leading to unintended control flow and Denial of Service in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) OR AAA virtual server receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-119
affected versions
citrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 13.1 < 13.1-37.236; citrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 13.1 < 13.1-59.19; citrix netscaler application delivery controller >= 14.1 < 14.1-47.46; and 2 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 9.2 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

The CNA scored it 9.2 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself support.citrix.com receipt

Dated events

2025-06-30Added to CISA KEV2025-07-01EPSS moved 0.00 to 0.152025-07-21CISA remediation due2025-11-18EPSS moved 0.02 to 0.242026-08-03EPSS moved 0.10 to 0.10

Movement the material steps

26 Jun 20250.00057
1 Jul 20250.14772 · crossed 0.10
16 Jul 20250.03542 · crossed 0.10
18 Nov 20250.23939 · crossed 0.10
21 Nov 20250.023 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.09756 · scoring model v2026.06.15
3 Aug 20260.10094 · crossed 0.10
15 Sep 20260.1014
Show all 45 observations
26 Jun 20250.00057
1 Jul 20250.14772
2 Jul 20250.16125
16 Jul 20250.03542
27 Jul 20250.03844
4 Aug 20250.04011
16 Aug 20250.03639
18 Aug 20250.04209
19 Aug 20250.03639
20 Aug 20250.04377
21 Aug 20250.04507
26 Aug 20250.03705
1 Sep 20250.03863
8 Sep 20250.0403
16 Sep 20250.01588
26 Sep 20250.01659
3 Oct 20250.01228
7 Oct 20250.01563
17 Oct 20250.02653
22 Oct 20250.01971
25 Oct 20250.03642
14 Nov 20250.023
18 Nov 20250.23939
21 Nov 20250.023
22 Nov 20250.02502
23 Nov 20250.02036
13 Dec 20250.02015
15 Dec 20250.02267
31 Dec 20250.03048
23 Feb 20260.02712
2 Mar 20260.01865
3 Mar 20260.02016
18 Mar 20260.02005
20 Apr 20260.02256
21 Apr 20260.01282
23 Apr 20260.01943
24 Apr 20260.01797
28 Apr 20260.01018
3 May 20260.00893
18 May 20260.01184
22 May 20260.01024
29 May 20260.01064
15 Jun 20260.09756
3 Aug 20260.10094
15 Sep 20260.1014

45 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.1014Published2025-06-25Public PoC2025-06-26CISA KEV2025-06-30Index as of2026-09-15

Listed by CISA 5 days after it published and the record had been public for 1 year, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-06-25 receipt · Public PoC 2025-06-26 receipt · CISA KEV 2025-06-30 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-119, improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer. The index holds 14296 prior instances of this class, 56 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-7775 · NetScaler ADCmatches 9 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2026-8452 · NetScaler ADCmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2023-4966 · Citrix NetScaler ADConly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2020-0796 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit…only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2017-0101 · Microsoft Corporation Windowsonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2017-1000253nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2017receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

14296 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

netscaler adc

Of the 5 records in this family, this is the only one holding a CISA KEV listing: Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway Buffer Overflow Vulnerabili.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-6543.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.