vciy

CVE-2022-24853

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

File system exposure in Metabase

CVE-2022-248534 of 4 sources documented this
34

rank 34 = 15 + 13 + 0 + 6 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.02524  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 34

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

6 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 34

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$77,100over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$83,500on 2025-04-28, the last material move, 1 year, 4 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$77,100 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.02524 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.02524EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-04-15, 1602 days at 0.03, as of 2026-09-03. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Fortinet FortiOSCVE-2016-6415Cisco Adaptivevitejs viteminioCVE-2016-238824853

This record is one instance of CWE-200, exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor. The index holds 11146 prior instances of this class, 18 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD5.3 MEDIUMreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running metabase? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actorreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-200: Confidentiality: Read Application Data[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchmetabase 0.40.8; metabase 0.41.7; metabase 0.42.4; metabase 1.40.8; metabase 1.41.7; metabase 1.42.4receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository, 2022-04-16.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository2022-04-16receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.02524 · top 16% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes33 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productmetabasereceipt
Published rangesmetabase >= 0.40.0 < 0.40.8; metabase >= 0.41.0 < 0.41.7; metabase >= 0.42.0 < 0.42.4; metabase >= 1.40.0 < 1.40.8receipt
Show all 6 published ranges
metabase >= 0.40.0 < 0.40.8
metabase >= 0.41.0 < 0.41.7
metabase >= 0.42.0 < 0.42.4
metabase >= 1.40.0 < 1.40.8
metabase >= 1.41.0 < 1.41.7
metabase >= 1.42.0 < 1.42.4

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionmetabaseCWE-200 information exposureConfidentiality lossC:Hexploits CWE-200data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Metabase is an open source business intelligence and analytics application. Metabase has a proxy to load arbitrary URLs for JSON maps as part of our GeoJSON support. While we do validation to not return contents of arbitrary URLs, there is a case where a particularly crafted request could result in file access on windows, which allows enabling an `NTLM relay attack`, potentially allowing an attacker to receive the system password hash. If you use Windows and are on this version of Metabase, please upgrade immediately. The following patches (or greater versions) are available: 0.42.4 and 1.42.4, 0.41.7 and 1.41.7, 0.40.8 and 1.40.8. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-200
affected versions
metabase >= 0.40.0 < 0.40.8; metabase >= 0.41.0 < 0.41.7; metabase >= 0.42.0 < 0.42.4; and 3 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 5.9 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

The CNA scored it 5.9 and NVD 5.3. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com qomplx.com secure77.de receipt

Dated events

2025-03-19EPSS moved 0.05 to 0.122026-06-15EPSS moved 0.10 to 0.02

Movement the material steps

15 Apr 20220.00885
7 Mar 20236.4e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.0491 · scoring model v2025.03.14
19 Mar 20250.12053 · crossed 0.10
20 Mar 20250.06147 · crossed 0.10
27 Mar 20250.12053 · crossed 0.10
28 Mar 20250.06147 · crossed 0.10
29 Mar 20250.12053 · crossed 0.10
30 Mar 20250.06147 · crossed 0.10
20 Apr 20250.11505 · crossed 0.10
28 Apr 20250.09286 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.02439 · scoring model v2026.06.15
3 Sep 20260.02524

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 30 observations
15 Apr 20220.00885
19 Apr 20220.0089
23 Apr 20220.00954
7 Mar 20236.4e-4
8 Mar 20230.00064
15 Mar 20230.00074
21 Apr 20230.00096
17 May 20230.00108
25 Sep 20230.00116
5 Nov 20230.00113
6 Jul 20240.00147
18 Nov 20240.00154
17 Dec 20240.00180
28 Dec 20240.00174
17 Mar 20250.0491
19 Mar 20250.12053
20 Mar 20250.06147
27 Mar 20250.12053
28 Mar 20250.06147
29 Mar 20250.12053
30 Mar 20250.06147
16 Apr 20250.07138
20 Apr 20250.11505
21 Apr 20250.1208
25 Apr 20250.12019
28 Apr 20250.09286
8 Oct 20250.09729
15 Jun 20260.02439
1 Jul 20260.02485
3 Sep 20260.02524

30 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.02524Published2022-04-14Public PoC2022-04-16Index as of2026-09-03

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-17 and 2025-03-19 (0.0491 → 0.12053) and the record had been public for 4 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-04-14 receipt · Public PoC 2022-04-16 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-03 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-200, exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor. The index holds 11146 prior instances of this class, 18 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-68686 · Fortinet FortiOSmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2016-6415matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2020-3259 · Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA)…matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2025-31125 · vitejs vitematches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-28432 · miniomatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2016-2388matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

11146 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

metabase

Of the 7 records in this family, this is the only one with public proof-of-concept code, and it holds 1 references to it.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-24853.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.