vciy

CVE-2020-3433

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability

CVE-2020-34334 of 4 sources documented this
68

rank 68 = 40 + 20 + 0 + 2 + 6

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.10049 · CISA KEV listed  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 48

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 68

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 66

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

CISA remediation date held  ·  without this subject the record ranks 62

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$501,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$361,000on 2025-11-21, the last material move, 9 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$501,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.10049 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.10049EPSSKEV · LISTED
Severity7.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal loss · ransomware-linkedreceipt
Exploitationransomware use knownreceipt
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-04-14, 1969 days at 0.10, as of 2026-09-04. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-427 Uncontrolled Search Path Elementreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-427: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands[email protected]
Ransomware campaign useKnown (CISA)receipt

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchanyconnect secure mobility client 4.9.00086receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
CISA remediation statusoverdue since 2022-11-14receipt
CISA required actionApply updates per vendor instructions.receipt
Published to CISA KEV798 daysderived

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Ransomware campaign use known, 2022-10-24.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository2020-09-25receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed2022-10-24receipt
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known2022-10-24receipt

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.8 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.10049 · top 5% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byciscoreceipt
Recorded changes48 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productCisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Clientreceipt
Published rangescisco anyconnect secure mobility client < 4.9.00086receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessrequires low privilegesCISA KEV listingadded 10-24 · due 11-14Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Cl…CWE-427 weaknessFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hmandates remediationexploits CWE-427data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the interprocess communication (IPC) channel of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a DLL hijacking attack. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the Windows system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of resources that are loaded by the application at run time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IPC message to the AnyConnect process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected machine with SYSTEM privileges. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the Windows system.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-427
affected versions
cisco anyconnect secure mobility client < 4.9.00086
also scored by
[email protected] 7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself tools.cisco.com packetstormsecurity.com receipt

Dated events

2021-09-14EPSS moved 0.16 to 0.032022-10-24Added to CISA KEV2022-11-14CISA remediation due2026-06-15EPSS moved 0.04 to 0.10

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.16309
14 Sep 20210.0257 · crossed 0.10
16 Sep 20210.16309 · crossed 0.10
4 Feb 20220.02683 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20237.7e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.03961 · scoring model v2025.03.14
19 Mar 20250.11808 · crossed 0.10
20 Mar 20250.05532 · crossed 0.10
27 Mar 20250.13383 · crossed 0.10
28 Mar 20250.06347 · crossed 0.10
29 Mar 20250.13383 · crossed 0.10
30 Mar 20250.06347 · crossed 0.10
29 Oct 20250.10547 · crossed 0.10
4 Nov 20250.09386 · crossed 0.10
18 Nov 20250.16615 · crossed 0.10
21 Nov 20250.09386 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.1013 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
3 Jul 20260.10049

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 34 observations
14 Apr 20210.16309
14 Sep 20210.0257
16 Sep 20210.16309
4 Feb 20220.02683
7 Mar 20237.7e-4
8 Mar 20230.00077
17 Dec 20240.00078
17 Mar 20250.03961
19 Mar 20250.11808
20 Mar 20250.05532
24 Mar 20250.06347
27 Mar 20250.13383
28 Mar 20250.06347
29 Mar 20250.13383
30 Mar 20250.06347
23 Jul 20250.06509
5 Aug 20250.06347
16 Aug 20250.06509
25 Aug 20250.07298
8 Sep 20250.06347
14 Oct 20250.07491
22 Oct 20250.08966
29 Oct 20250.10547
4 Nov 20250.09386
18 Nov 20250.16615
21 Nov 20250.09386
11 Dec 20250.08225
17 Dec 20250.0684
31 Dec 20250.04462
18 Feb 20260.04579
25 Feb 20260.04462
9 Jun 20260.03924
15 Jun 20260.1013
3 Jul 20260.10049

34 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.10049Published2020-08-17Public PoC2020-09-25CISA KEV2022-10-24Index as of2026-09-04

Listed by CISA 798 days after it published, exploit probability more than doubled between 2021-09-14 and 2021-09-16 (0.0257 → 0.16309) and the record had been public for 6 years when this index was last written.

No material movement in 63 days as of the last ingest this index recorded.

Published 2020-08-17 receipt · Public PoC 2020-09-25 receipt · CISA KEV 2022-10-24 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-04 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

cisco anyconnect secure mobility client

Of the 3 records in this family, this is the only one holding a CISA KEV listing: Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows DLL Hija.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2020-3433.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.