vciy

CVE-2026-89091

INDEX BUILT · 2026-10-18

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Ansible-core: ansible-core: ansible-galaxy collection install symlink path escape allows arbitrary file write / code execution

CVE-2026-890913 of 4 sources documented this
22

rank 22 = 0 + 22 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00480  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Hindsight · the state

0.0048EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-10-18
Severity8.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementone observationreceipt
SINGLE READINGOne observation held. There is no shape yet. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Microsoft WindowsCVE-2024-57728CVE-2022-30333CVE-2020-36193CVE-2015-1130Microsoft Windows89091

This record is one instance of CWE-59, improper link resolution before file access ('link following'). The index holds 1821 prior instances of this class, 25 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Which product do you run? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Choose your product above to watch it.

Set up a watchlist (free with an account: one stack of three products)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

Patch by…

Or open an investigation: an incident or a near miss on this CVE, kept with its evidence where anyone in your organisation can find it.

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · user interaction required · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-59 Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-59: Confidentiality, Integrity, Access Control: Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Bypass Protection Mechanism; Other: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commandscwe-consequences@4.20

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 9 Oct 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
BOD 26-04 deadlineIf the system is reachable from the internet: 14 days. If not: fix at the next system upgrade.derived
Show full BOD 26-04 deadline

CISA has not scored it, so the directive's own defaults apply: automatable no, technical impact total. Calendar days from the KEV listing or from when you find it on a system, whichever is first. Federal agencies are bound from 7 Dec 2026, and contracts often carry it to suppliers. The directive and its table

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.8 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.0048 · top 60% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byredhatreceipt
Recorded changes1 · last 18 Oct 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productRed Hat Migration Toolkit for Applications 8; Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Virtualization; Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3; Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2…receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$24,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementnot heldno dated series to read a change from
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$24,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.0048 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires user interactionRed Hat Discovery 2CWE-59 weaknessFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-59data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

A flaw was found in ansible-core. When installing a collection with `ansible-galaxy collection install`, the archive extractor validates member paths using lexical path normalisation (os.path.abspath) instead of resolving symbolic links (os.path.realpath), and it performs no containment check on symlink-typed directory members before creating them. A crafted collection tarball can chain symlink directory entries so that a subsequent file member is written outside the intended destination directory. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

This allows an attacker who can get a victim to install a malicious collection to overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the user running ansible-galaxy, leading to code execution on the control node. This is a bypass of the fix for CVE-2020-10691.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-59
also scored by
secalert@redhat.com 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself access.redhat.com bugzilla.redhat.com receipt

Movement

Only one observation of this value is held, so there is no movement to show yet.

The full biography

Published2026-10-08Index as of2026-10-09

The record had been public for 1 day when this index was last written.

Published 2026-10-08 receipt · Index as of 2026-10-09 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-59, improper link resolution before file access ('link following'). The index holds 1821 prior instances of this class, 25 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. cwe-consequences@4.20

CVE-2020-0787 · Microsoft Windowsmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2024-57728matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2022-30333matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2020-36193matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2015-1130matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2015receipt
CVE-2025-60710 · Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

1821 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-89091.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.