vciy

CVE-2026-86861

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

pgAdmin 4: File Manager save_file writes through a symbolic link planted after the containment check

CVE-2026-868613 of 4 sources documented this
15

rank 15 = 0 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00440  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.9, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$15,800over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementnot heldno dated series to read a change from
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$15,800 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.7179585840212677 exposure x 0.0044 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.0044EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementone observationreceipt
SINGLE READINGOne observation held. There is no shape yet. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Microsoft WindowsApple tvOSLinuxMicrosoft 365VMware ESXiCVE-2015-324686861

This record is one instance of CWE-367, time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition. The index holds 833 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running pgadmin.org pgAdmin 4? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete integrity loss; partial availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition; CWE-59 Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-367: Integrity, Other: Alter Execution Logic, Unexpected State; Integrity, Other: Modify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories, Modify Memory, Other; Integrity, Other: Other…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in9.18receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.0044 · top 62% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byPostgreSQLreceipt
Recorded changes1 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productpgadmin.org pgAdmin 4receipt
Fixed in9.18receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires low privilegespgadmin.org pgAdmin 4CWE-367 weaknessIntegrity lossI:Hexploits CWE-367data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

pgAdmin 4's File Manager save_file endpoint, which backs saving from the Query Tool and ERD, validated the requested path with Filemanager.check_access_permission() and then opened the file for writing with a plain open() call. CVE-2026-7819 had previously hardened the separate file upload path by opening its target with O_NOFOLLOW, so that the kernel refuses to follow a symbolic link at the final path component, but save_file was left on an unprotected open(). receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

A symbolic link already present when the check ran was rejected by the check itself; the remaining exposure was a link substituted at the final path component in the interval between the check and the write, at which point the write followed the link and landed outside the user's storage directory, creating or overwriting an arbitrary file as the operating-system account running pgAdmin. Exploitation requires the ability to create or replace a symbolic link inside the requesting user's storage directory. pgAdmin exposes no interface that creates symbolic links, so this requires filesystem access to the pgAdmin host or to a shared or network-mounted storage backend, together with winning the timing window. The reporter did not achieve a write against a released version, having attempted approximately 63,000 racing requests without success; the reported defect is the uncovered write path rather than a demonstrated sandbox escape. The fix routes save_file's write through the same O_NOFOLLOW-protected helper already used by the upload path, so both File Manager write sinks carry identical kernel-enforced protection, and reports a symbolic-link refusal explicitly instead of surfacing the underlying system error text. Note that files created by save_file are now given mode 0600, inheriting the behaviour introduced for uploads. The protection covers the final path component; substitution of an intermediate directory component is not addressed by this change. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from the introduction of the containment check in the File Manager save path before 9.18.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-59; CWE-367
also scored by
6 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X · 5.9…

check it yourself github.com receipt

Movement

Only one observation of this value is held, so there is no movement to show yet.

The full biography

Published2026-09-17Index as of2026-09-18

The record had been public for 1 day when this index was last written.

Published 2026-09-17 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-18 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-367, time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition. The index holds 833 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-30088 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2022-48618 · Apple tvOSmatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2025-38352 · Linuxmatches 4 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-35311 · Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprisematches 3 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2025-22224 · VMware ESXimatches 2 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2015-3246only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2015receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

833 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-86861.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.