vciy

CVE-2026-82429

INDEX BUILT · 2026-10-18

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Apache Storm Worker Launcher: Local Privilege Escalation to Root via a Time-of-Check Race in the Worker Launcher

CVE-2026-824293 of 4 sources documented this
unranked

No rank

rank@v1 withholds a number for this record

nothing this rule scores is held for this record, so there is no ordering to state. That is a fact about the sources, not a finding about the software.

Hindsight · the state

0.00127EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-10-18
Severitynot scored
Harmnot stated
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementsteadyreceipt
STEADY10Holding near 0.00 across 2 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Microsoft WindowsVMware ESXiLinuxApple tvOSMicrosoft 365CVE-2015-324682429

This record is one instance of CWE-367, time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition. The index holds 903 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running Apache Storm Worker Launcher? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Watch Apache Storm Worker Launcher

Set up a watchlist (free with an account: one stack of three products)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

Patch by…

Or open an investigation: an incident or a near miss on this CVE, kept with its evidence where anyone in your organisation can find it.

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

ReachNo CVSS vector in held sources, so no reach or impact can be stated.
Weakness classCWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Conditionreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-367: Integrity, Other: Alter Execution Logic, Unexpected State; Integrity, Other: Modify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories, Modify Memory, Other; Integrity, Other: Other…cwe-consequences@4.20

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in3.1.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
BOD 26-04 deadlineIf the system is reachable from the internet: 14 days. If not: fix at the next system upgrade.derived
Show full BOD 26-04 deadline

CISA has not scored it, so the directive's own defaults apply: automatable no, technical impact total. Calendar days from the KEV listing or from when you find it on a system, whichever is first. Federal agencies are bound from 7 Dec 2026, and contracts often carry it to suppliers. The directive and its table

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

Exploit probability0.00127 · top 98% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byapachereceipt
Recorded changes2 · last 18 Oct 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productApache Software Foundation Apache Storm Worker Launcherreceipt
Fixed in3.1.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Description The setuid-root `worker-launcher` binary adjusts ownership and permissions of worker directories by walking the tree with FTS and calling `lchown` and `chmod` on each entry's full pathname while running with an effective uid of 0. Both syscalls re-resolve the path at the time of the call, after FTS has classified the entry, and the trees being walked are owned and writable by the untrusted topology user. A tenant running code on a supervisor node could therefore replace an intermediate directory component with a symbolic link between classification and the privileged operation, redirecting the root-owned `lchown` or `chmod` at an arbitrary file on the host. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

The operation is repeatable at will, since crashing a worker forces a relaunch and blob updates re-run the walk, so a failed attempt costs the attacker nothing. This crosses the boundary that `supervisor.run.worker.as.user` and container isolation are intended to enforce. It is the same defect class as the Hadoop container-executor issues from which this code derives. Mitigation Upgrade to 3.1.0, where the privileged walk operates on file descriptors it has already stat'd rather than on pathnames re-resolved at call time. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should not run untrusted topology code on supervisors configured with `supervisor.run.worker.as.user`, since the launcher is the boundary being crossed. Note that the launcher must be rebuilt and reinstalled after upgrading; replacing the Java artifacts alone is not sufficient. Credit The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-367
also scored by
7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself lists.apache.org receipt

Movement the material steps

15 Sep 20260.00131
28 Sep 20260.00127
Show all 2 observations
15 Sep 20260.00131
28 Sep 20260.00127

2 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00127Published2026-09-14Index as of2026-09-28

The record had been public for 14 days when this index was last written.

Published 2026-09-14 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-28 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-367, time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition. The index holds 903 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. cwe-consequences@4.20

CVE-2024-30088 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2025-22224 · VMware ESXionly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-38352 · Linuxonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2022-48618 · Apple tvOSonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-35311 · Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterpriseonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2015-3246nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2015receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

903 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-82429.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.