vciy

CVE-2026-73800

INDEX BUILT · 2026-10-18

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Gitea reusable workflow secret exposure in pull_request_target

CVE-2026-738003 of 4 sources documented this
unranked

No rank

rank@v1 withholds a number for this record

nothing this rule scores is held for this record, so there is no ordering to state. That is a fact about the sources, not a finding about the software.

Hindsight · the state

0.00223EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-10-18
Severitynot scored
Harmnot stated
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementone observationreceipt
SINGLE READINGOne observation held. There is no shape yet. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

SonicWall SMA1000langflow-aiMicrosoftRejetto HTTP FileCitrix NetScaler73800

This record is one instance of CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'). The index holds 7492 prior instances of this class, 82 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running Gitea? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Watch Gitea

Set up a watchlist (free with an account: one stack of three products)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

Patch by…

Or open an investigation: an incident or a near miss on this CVE, kept with its evidence where anyone in your organisation can find it.

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

ReachNo CVSS vector in held sources, so no reach or impact can be stated.
Weakness classCWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'); CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Spherereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-94: Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands…cwe-consequences@4.20

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in1.27.2receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
BOD 26-04 deadlineIf the system is reachable from the internet: 14 days. If not: fix at the next system upgrade.derived
Show full BOD 26-04 deadline

CISA has not scored it, so the directive's own defaults apply: automatable no, technical impact total. Calendar days from the KEV listing or from when you find it on a system, whichever is first. Federal agencies are bound from 7 Dec 2026, and contracts often carry it to suppliers. The directive and its table

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

Exploit probability0.00223 · top 88% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byGiteareceipt
Recorded changes1 · last 18 Oct 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productGiteareceipt
Fixed in1.27.2receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Gitea resolves local reusable workflow files from a fork's head commit when a trusted base-branch workflow runs for a pull_request_target event. A fork author can modify a referenced reusable workflow so attacker-controlled code executes with the repository and organization secrets available to that event. Exploitation requires a base workflow that calls a local reusable workflow, and bypasses the intended separation between trusted base code and untrusted fork code. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-94; CWE-829

check it yourself github.com blog.gitea.com github.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement

Only one observation of this value is held, so there is no movement to show yet.

The full biography

Published2026-10-14Index as of2026-10-15

The record had been public for 1 day when this index was last written.

Published 2026-10-14 receipt · Index as of 2026-10-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'). The index holds 7492 prior instances of this class, 82 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. cwe-consequences@4.20

CVE-2026-15410 · SonicWall SMA1000only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-3248 · langflow-ai langflowonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-49704 · Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-23692 · Rejetto HTTP File Serveronly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-24955 · Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-3519 · Citrix NetScaler ADConly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

7492 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-73800.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.