vciy

CVE-2026-66884

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback accepts callbacks with no authorize session or no state parameter, defeating CSRF protection

CVE-2026-668843 of 4 sources documented this
5

rank 5 = 0 + 5 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00214  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 2.1, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$4,570over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementnot heldno dated series to read a change from
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$4,570 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.42806422275080447 exposure x 0.00214 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00214EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity2.1 LOWreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementone observationreceipt
SINGLE READINGOne observation held. There is no shape yet. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

ray-project rayPaperCut NG/MFCVE-2020-10181CVE-2016-6277CVE-2014-100005CVE-2008-412866884

This record is one instance of CWE-352, cross-site request forgery (csrf). The index holds 9825 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · active user interaction · low attack complexity · attack requirements presentreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality and integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)receipt
Published consequencesCWE-352: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation, Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in0.5.0; 97d75afc57826dca31989b47d6e2a3c136039917receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA2.1 LOWreceipt
Exploit probability0.00214 · top 88% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byEEFreceipt
Recorded changes1 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productErlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plugreceipt
Fixed in0.5.0; 97d75afc57826dca31989b47d6e2a3c136039917receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback module) allows an attacker to make a victim's browser complete an authorization flow the victim never initiated. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex and program routine Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2. A callback request that carries no Oidcc.Plug.Authorize session is processed with every security check disabled rather than being rejected. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

call/2 substitutes permissive defaults for the absent session, and each downstream check treats its value as nothing to compare and returns :ok, so the nonce, state, PKCE, peer IP and user agent checks are all skipped. A separate clause of check_state/2 also accepts a state-less request when a verifier is present. An attacker obtains an authorization code for their own provider account, then induces the victim to visit the callback endpoint with that code and no state parameter. The application signs the victim in as the attacker, so the victim's subsequent actions occur in the attacker's account where the attacker can read them. Applications reusing one callback for both signing in and linking a provider account are further exposed to account takeover, the attacker's account becoming linked to the victim's. The permissive fallback serves no conforming flow. Third-party-initiated login reaches a relying party at a separate login initiation endpoint and causes it to send a fresh authentication request, and this library implements no such endpoint. Oidcc.Plug.Authorize always sends a state parameter, which an authorization server must echo, so no legitimate callback lacks one. This issue affects oidcc_plug: from 0.2.0-beta.1 before 0.5.0.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-352
also scored by
2.1 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

check it yourself github.com cna.erlef.org osv.dev github.com receipt

Movement

Only one observation of this value is held, so there is no movement to show yet.

The full biography

Published2026-08-04Index as of2026-08-05

The record had been public for 1 day when this index was last written.

Published 2026-08-04 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-05 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-352, cross-site request forgery (csrf). The index holds 9825 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-62593 · ray-project raymatches 3 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-2533 · PaperCut NG/MFonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2020-10181nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2016-6277nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2014-100005nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2015receipt
CVE-2008-4128nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2008receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

9825 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-66884.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.