vciy

CVE-2026-64649

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Next.js: Server-Side Request Forgery in Server Actions on Custom Servers

CVE-2026-646494 of 4 sources documented this
20

rank 20 = 0 + 16 + 0 + 4 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00872  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 4

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

2 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$31,200over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$31,200 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.7179585840212677 exposure x 0.00872 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00872EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.3 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-07-28, 31 days at 0.01, as of 2026-08-28. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

SonicWall SMA1000ConfiguratorIvanti ICSMicrosoftVMware vRealizeVMware vCenter64649

This record is one instance of CWE-918, server-side request forgery (ssrf). The index holds 3592 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M8.3 HIGHreceipt
NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Scoring standard
GitHub_MCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running vercel next.js? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · attack requirements presentreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality loss; partial integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)receipt
Published consequencesCWE-918: Confidentiality: Read Application Data; Integrity: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchnext.js 15.5.21; next.js 16.2.11receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.3 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00872 · top 43% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes4 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productvercel next.jsreceipt
Published rangesvercel next.js >= 14.1.1 < 15.5.21; vercel next.js >= 16.0.0 < 16.2.11receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. In versions 14.1.1 through 15.5.20 and 16.0.0 through 16.2.10, when a Server Action forwards or redirects a request, an attacker can cause the server to send that outbound request to a malicious host (Server-Side Request Forgery). This requires the attacker's request to control Host-associated headers. In some configurations, it's also possible to obtain internal values that weaken middleware/proxy authorization. Applications that use Server Actions are affected when the incoming host header is not fixed to a trusted value. This typically occurs on custom servers, or on deployments not behind a proxy that pins the host. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

Managed hosting pins the host upstream and is not affected; next start and standalone output do the same from version 14.2 onward. This issue has been fixed in versions 15.5.21 and 16.2.11.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
weakness
CWE-918
affected versions
vercel next.js >= 14.1.1 < 15.5.21; vercel next.js >= 16.0.0 < 16.2.11
also scored by
[email protected] 8.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

The CNA scored it 8.3 and NVD 6.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

28 Jul 20260.00622
28 Aug 20260.00872
Show all 4 observations
28 Jul 20260.00622
30 Jul 20260.00448
13 Aug 20260.00536
28 Aug 20260.00872

4 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00872Published2026-07-27Index as of2026-08-28

The record had been public for 1 month when this index was last written.

Published 2026-07-27 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-28 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-918, server-side request forgery (ssrf). The index holds 3592 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-15409 · SonicWall SMA1000only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-61884 · Oracle Configuratoronly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-21893 · Ivanti ICSonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2022-41040 · Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Cumulative…only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-21975 · VMware vRealize Operationsonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-21985 · VMware vCenter Server and VMware Cloud…only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3592 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

vercel next.js

Of the 3 records in this family that state one, this holds the lowest NVD CVSS score: 6.5.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-64649.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.