vciy

CVE-2026-6106

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

1Panel-dev MaxKB Public Chat static_headers_middleware.py StaticHeadersMiddleware cross site scripting

CVE-2026-61063 of 4 sources documented this
13

rank 13 = 0 + 13 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00266  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.1, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$3,190over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$3,190 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.00266 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00266EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.1 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-04-12, 64 days at 0.00, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

MDaemon EmailQNAP Systems Inc.Cisco AdaptiveCVE-2018-6882Zimbra6106

This record is one instance of CWE-79, improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting'). The index holds 47894 prior instances of this class, 32 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running 1Panel-dev MaxKB? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · passive user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactPartial integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'); CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code…receipt
Published consequencesCWE-79: Access Control, Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data; Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in2.8.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.1 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00266 · top 81% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byVulDBreceipt
Recorded changes4 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected product1Panel-dev MaxKBreceipt
Fixed in2.8.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability was detected in 1Panel-dev MaxKB up to 2.2.1. This vulnerability affects the function StaticHeadersMiddleware of the file apps/common/middleware/static_headers_middleware.py of the component Public Chat Interface. The manipulation of the argument Name results in cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.8.0 is able to resolve this issue. The patch is identified as 026a2d623e2aa5efa67c4834651e79d5d7cab1da. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-79; CWE-94
also scored by
[email protected] 2 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X · [email protected] 3.5…

check it yourself vuldb.com vuldb.com vuldb.com github.com github.com github.com +2 morereceipt

Movement the material steps

12 Apr 20260.00033
15 Jun 20260.00266 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 4 observations
12 Apr 20260.00033
21 Apr 20260.00013
13 May 20260.00015
15 Jun 20260.00266

4 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00266Published2026-04-11Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2026-04-11 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-79, improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting'). The index holds 47894 prior instances of this class, 32 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-11182 · MDaemon Email Servermatches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2018-19943 · QNAP Systems Inc. QTSonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2018-19953 · QNAP Systems Inc. QTSonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2020-3580 · Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA)…only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2018-6882only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2025-66376 · Zimbra Collaborationonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

47894 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

1panel-dev maxkb

Of the 6 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names public chat static_headers_middleware.py.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-6106.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.