vciy

CVE-2026-48706

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Envoy Heap Buffer Overflow in TcpStatsdSink

CVE-2026-487064 of 4 sources documented this
24

rank 24 = 0 + 19 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00610  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$18,600over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$18,600 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.0061 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.0061EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementsteadyreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-27, 62 days at 0.01, as of 2026-08-28. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2018-6789CVE-2022-37055CVE-2020-15069CVE-2016-10174CVE-2017-7269SonicWall SonicOS48706

This record is one instance of CWE-120, buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow'). The index holds 4490 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running envoyproxy envoy? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-120: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Availability: Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchenvoy 1.35.13; envoy 1.36.9; envoy 1.37.5; envoy 1.38.3receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.0061 · top 52% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes4 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productenvoyproxy envoyreceipt
Published rangesenvoyproxy envoy >= 1.34.0 < 1.35.13; envoyproxy envoy >= 1.36.0 < 1.36.9; envoyproxy envoy >= 1.37.0 < 1.37.5; envoyproxy envoy >= 1.38.0 < 1.38.3receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionenvoyproxy envoyCWE-120 weaknessAvailability lossA:Hexploits CWE-120data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy designed for cloud-native applications. From 1.34.0 until 1.35.13, 1.36.9, 1.37.5, and 1.38.3, a vulnerability exists in Envoy's TCP StatsD sink (TcpStatsdSink), where the thread-local flusher buffer can be overflowed by exceptionally long statistic names (e.g., >16KiB). During formatting, TcpStatsdSink reserves a single contiguous memory slice of 16KiB (FLUSH_SLICE_SIZE_BYTES). If formatting a single metric exceeds the remaining capacity, the flusher initiates a buffer rotation but incorrectly continues to allocate another fixed 16KiB slice. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

If an attacker can trigger a statistic name longer than 16KiB—for example, by sending an HTTP or gRPC request with an extremely long request path (:path) that is recorded by the grpc_stats filter configured with stats_for_all_methods: true—the flusher will attempt to copy the metric name using memcpy operations beyond the allocated heap buffer boundaries. This leads to a heap write overflow, which can cause immediate denial-of-service (process crash) or potential remote code execution (RCE). This vulnerability is fixed in 1.35.13, 1.36.9, 1.37.5, and 1.38.3.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-120
affected versions
envoyproxy envoy >= 1.34.0 < 1.35.13; envoyproxy envoy >= 1.36.0 < 1.36.9; envoyproxy envoy >= 1.37.0 < 1.37.5; and 1 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 5.9 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

The CNA scored it 5.9 and NVD 7.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

27 Jun 20260.00557
28 Aug 20260.0061
Show all 4 observations
27 Jun 20260.00557
30 Jun 20260.0061
24 Jul 20260.00376
28 Aug 20260.0061

4 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.0061Published2026-06-26Index as of2026-08-28

The record had been public for 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2026-06-26 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-28 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-120, buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow'). The index holds 4490 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2018-6789matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2022-37055matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2020-15069matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2016-10174matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2017-7269matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2020-5135 · SonicWall SonicOSmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

4490 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-48706.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.