vciy

CVE-2026-4194

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

D-Link DNS-1550-04 system_mgr.cgi cgi_set_wto access control

CVE-2026-41944 of 4 sources documented this
35

rank 35 = 0 + 25 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01238  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$35,500over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$35,500 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.5743756121449558 exposure x 0.01238 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01238EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity6.9 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-03-16, 91 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

joomlacontentedi…SonicWall SonicOSPaperCut NGCitrix ShareFileCVE-2019-11634CVE-2013-04224194

This record is one instance of CWE-284, improper access control. The index holds 8101 prior instances of this class, 35 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
VulDB6.9 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Scoring standard
VulDBCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running D-Link DNS-120? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-284 Improper Access Control; CWE-266 Incorrect Privilege Assignmentreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-284: Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA6.9 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.01238 · top 32% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth20 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byVulDBreceipt
Recorded changes7 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productD-Link DNS-120; D-Link DNR-202L; D-Link DNS-315L; D-Link DNS-320; D-Link DNS-320L; D-Link DNS-320LW; D-Link DNS-321; D-Link DNR-322L; D-Link DNS-323; D-Link DNS-325; D-Link DNS-326; D-Link DNS-327L…receipt
Published rangesdlink dns-1550-04 firmware <= 2026-02-05; dlink dnr-202l firmware <= 2026-02-05; dlink dnr-326 firmware <= 2026-02-05; dlink dns-1100-4 firmware <= 2026-02-05receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
dlink dns-1550-04 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dnr-202l firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dnr-326 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-1100-4 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-120 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-1200-05 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-315l firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-320 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-320l firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-320lw firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-321 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-322l firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-323 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-325 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-326 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-327l firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-340l firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-343 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-345 firmware <= 2026-02-05
dlink dns-726-4 firmware <= 2026-02-05

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05 and DNS-1550-04 up to 20260205. The impacted element is the function cgi_set_wto of the file /cgi-bin/system_mgr.cgi. Performing a manipulation results in improper access controls. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-266; CWE-284
affected versions
dlink dns-1550-04 firmware <= 2026-02-05; dlink dnr-202l firmware <= 2026-02-05; dlink dnr-326 firmware <= 2026-02-05; and 17 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 5.5 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X · [email protected] 7.3…

The CNA scored it 6.9 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself vuldb.com vuldb.com vuldb.com github.com dlink.com receipt

Movement the material steps

16 Mar 20260.00045
15 Jun 20260.01238 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 7 observations
16 Mar 20260.00045
20 Mar 20260.00039
21 Mar 20260.00052
16 Apr 20260.0006
26 Apr 20260.0011
22 May 20260.00115
15 Jun 20260.01238

7 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01238Published2026-03-15Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2026-03-15 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-284, improper access control. The index holds 8101 prior instances of this class, 35 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-48907 · joomlacontenteditor.net Joomla Content Editor…matches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2024-40766 · SonicWall SonicOSonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-27350 · PaperCut NGonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-22941 · Citrix ShareFile storage zones controlleronly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2019-11634only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2013-0422only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2013receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

8101 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

d-link dns-120

Of the 4 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest EPSS percentile: 0.67057.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-4194.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.