vciy

CVE-2026-20316

INDEX BUILT · 2026-10-18

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software Static Credential Vulnerability

CVE-2026-203164 of 4 sources documented this
74

rank 74 = 40 + 13 + 4 + 7 + 10

rank@v1 · act now

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.35096 · CISA KEV listed  ·  without this subject the record ranks 34

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.3, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 61

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2026-09-28  ·  without this subject the record ranks 70

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

7 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 67

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

CISA remediation date held  ·  without this subject the record ranks 64

Hindsight · the state

0.35096EPSSKEV · LISTED
Severity5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · network · ransomware-linkedreceipt
Exploitationransomware use knownreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.00788 to 0.35096 across 4 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center…? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Watch Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC)

Set up a watchlist (free with an account: one stack of three products)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

Patch by…

Or open an investigation: an incident or a near miss on this CVE, kept with its evidence where anyone in your organisation can find it.

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-259 Use of Hard-coded Passwordreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-259: Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Hide Activities, Reduce Maintainabilitycwe-consequences@4.20
Ransomware campaign useKnown (CISA)receipt

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 28 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
CISA remediation statusoverdue since 2026-08-01receipt
CISA required actionApply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see…receipt
Show full CISA required action

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

BOD 26-04 deadlineNot worked out yet. CISA scores every KEV entry for the directive, and this index has not loaded its scoring for this one.
Published to CISA KEVsame dayderived

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Ransomware campaign use known, 2026-07-29.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed2026-07-29receipt
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known2026-07-29receipt

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.35096 · top 2% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byciscoreceipt
Recorded changes16 · last 17 Oct 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productCisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC)receipt
Published rangescisco secure firewall management center >= 7.0.0 <= 7.0.9; cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.2.0 <= 7.2.11; cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.3.0 <= 7.3.1.2; cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.4.0 <= 7.4.7receipt
Show all 7 published ranges
cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.0.0 <= 7.0.9
cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.2.0 <= 7.2.11
cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.3.0 <= 7.3.1.2
cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.4.0 <= 7.4.7
cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.6.0 <= 7.6.5
cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.7.0 <= 7.7.12
cisco secure firewall management center >= 10.0.0 <= 10.0.1

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$421,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$16,000on 2026-09-10, the last material move, 18 days before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$421,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.35096 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to log in to an affected device using a low-privileged account to access sensitive data within the impacted systems. This vulnerability is due to the presence of static user credentials for a low-privileged&nbsp;account. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using the account to log in to an affected system. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

A successful exploit could allow the attacker to log in to the affected system and access sensitive data as the low-privileged user.&nbsp; Note:&nbsp;If the FMC management interface does not have public internet access, the attack surface that is associated with this vulnerability is reduced.&nbsp;&nbsp; Cisco has assigned this security advisory a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of High rather than Medium as the score indicates. The reason is that this vulnerability can be used with other Cisco Secure FMC Software vulnerabilities to elevate privileges.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-259
affected versions
cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.0.0 <= 7.0.9; cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.2.0 <= 7.2.11; cisco secure firewall management center >= 7.3.0 <= 7.3.1.2; and 4 more, listed in full below
also scored by
psirt@cisco.com 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

check it yourself sec.cloudapps.cisco.com receipt

Dated events

2026-07-29Added to CISA KEV2026-08-01CISA remediation due2026-08-28EPSS moved 0.01 to 0.102026-09-10EPSS moved 0.10 to 0.112026-09-28EPSS moved 0.11 to 0.35

Movement the material steps

30 Jul 20260.00788
10 Sep 20260.11153 · crossed 0.10
28 Sep 20260.35096
Show all 4 observations
30 Jul 20260.00788
28 Aug 20260.09816
10 Sep 20260.11153
28 Sep 20260.35096

4 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.35096Published · CISA KEV2026-07-29Index as of2026-09-28

Listed by CISA on the day it published and the record had been public for 1 month when this index was last written.

Published 2026-07-29 receipt · CISA KEV 2026-07-29 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-28 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-20316.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.