vciy

CVE-2026-18798

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

QUIC Server May Trigger Double Free When Processing INITIAL Packet

CVE-2026-187983 of 4 sources documented this
unranked

No rank

rank@v1 withholds a number for this record

nothing this rule scores is held for this record, so there is no ordering to state. That is a fact about the sources, not a finding about the software.

Hindsight · the state

0.01481EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severitynot scored
Harmnot stated
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementone observationreceipt
SINGLE READINGOne observation held. There is no shape yet. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft WindowsLinux KernelApple iOSAdobe AcrobatCVE-2014-050218798

This record is one instance of CWE-415, double free. The index holds 885 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running OpenSSL? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

ReachNo CVSS vector in held sources, so no reach or impact can be stated.
Weakness classCWE-415 Double Freereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-415: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in4.0.2; 3.6.4; 3.5.8receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

Exploit probability0.01481 · top 27% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byopensslreceipt
Recorded changes1 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productOpenSSLreceipt
Fixed in4.0.2; 3.6.4; 3.5.8receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Issue summary: QUIC server may double free QRX (QUIC record layer RX) object when channel creation fails for initial packet. Impact summary: Double free leads to heap corruption, which typically results in termination of QUIC server process, leading to Denial of Service. There is so far no evidence that this double free is exploitable for remote code execution, thus it is considered highly improbable. CWE: CWE-415: Double Free Description: In order to validate initial packet, OpenSSL QUIC stack default packet handler (port_default_packet_handler()) creates a so-called QRX object. If the initial packet validates successfully with QRX object, the default packet handler proceeds to channel receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

(connection object) creation. The QRX object used for packet validation is passed to port_bind_channel(), so it becomes part of the newly created connection. If port_bind_channel() fails, then it also frees the QRX object. Once port_bind_channel() returns, the port_default_packet_handler() detects the failure and proceeds to the error branch, where the same QRX object is freed for the second time. The failure in port_bind_channel() function can be induced with a relatively low effort by a malformed (non RFC 9000 compliant) INITIAL packet. If the packet carries DCID (destination connection ID) which is shorter than 8 bytes, then port_bind_channel() jumps to the error path after ossl_quic_lcidm_enrol_odcid() detects that the DCID has invalid length. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected, as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-415
also scored by
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

check it yourself openssl-library.org github.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement

Only one observation of this value is held, so there is no movement to show yet.

The full biography

Published2026-08-25Index as of2026-08-28

The record had been public for 3 days when this index was last written.

Published 2026-08-25 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-28 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-415, double free. The index holds 885 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-33824 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-62215 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2021-22600 · Linux Kernelonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2020-9859 · Apple iOSonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2018-4990 · Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20038…only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2014-0502nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2014receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

885 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

openssl

Of the 3 records in this family, this is the only one holding a stated fix version: 4.0.2; 3.6.4; 3.5.8.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-18798.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.