vciy

CVE-2026-10654

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

RFCOMM session-disconnect race leaks session/L2CAP and denies further RFCOMM service in Zephyr Bluetooth Classic

CVE-2026-106544 of 4 sources documented this
10

rank 10 = 0 + 8 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00172  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 3.1, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 8

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$2,060over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$2,060 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.00172 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00172EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity3.1 LOWreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-07-01, 58 days at 0.00, as of 2026-08-28. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

MozillaCVE-2016-5195Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows10654

This record is one instance of CWE-362, concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition'). The index holds 2680 prior instances of this class, 12 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running zephyrproject zephyr? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachreachable from an adjacent network · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-362: Availability: DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Resource Consumption (Other); Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Instability…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in4.5.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA3.1 LOWreceipt
Exploit probability0.00172 · top 93% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byzephyrreceipt
Recorded changes4 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productzephyrproject zephyrreceipt
Published rangeszephyrproject zephyr >= 1.6.0 <= 4.4.1receipt
Fixed in4.5.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A race condition in the Zephyr Bluetooth Classic RFCOMM host stack (subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/rfcomm.c) mishandles a simultaneous bidirectional session disconnect. When the local device has initiated a session teardown (state BT_RFCOMM_STATE_DISCONNECTING, DISC sent, RTX timer armed) and the connected peer concurrently sends its own DISC frame for dlci 0, rfcomm_handle_disc() invokes rfcomm_session_disconnected(), which unconditionally forced the session to BT_RFCOMM_STATE_DISCONNECTED without ever calling bt_l2cap_chan_disconnect(). Because the recovery timer was also cancelled and a later UA is ignored in the DISCONNECTED state, the session becomes permanently wedged: the underlying L receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

2CAP channel is never released and the session slot in the fixed bt_rfcomm_pool[CONFIG_BT_MAX_CONN] array is never reclaimed (its conn pointer stays set). Subsequent bt_rfcomm_dlc_connect() calls on that connection fail with -EINVAL due to the invalid session state, so RFCOMM service is denied for that peer, and repeated occurrences can exhaust the session pool. The DISC frame is peer-controlled over the air, but exploitation requires the peer's DISC to collide with a local-initiated disconnect (a high-complexity timing race). Impact is availability/resource-leak only; there is no memory-safety, confidentiality, or integrity consequence. The defect shipped in released versions (present in v4.4.0 and earlier). The fix only transitions to DISCONNECTED when the session is not already in DISCONNECTING, preserving the proper L2CAP teardown path.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-362
affected versions
zephyrproject zephyr >= 1.6.0 <= 4.4.1
also scored by
[email protected] 3.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

check it yourself github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

1 Jul 20260.00124
28 Aug 20260.00172
Show all 4 observations
1 Jul 20260.00124
7 Jul 20260.00128
24 Jul 20260.00198
28 Aug 20260.00172

4 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00172Published2026-06-30Index as of2026-08-28

The record had been public for 1 month when this index was last written.

Published 2026-06-30 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-28 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-362, concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition'). The index holds 2680 prior instances of this class, 12 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2020-6819 · Mozilla Thunderbirdmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2020-6820 · Mozilla Thunderbirdmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2016-5195matches 3 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2023-36884 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 3 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2025-62215 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 3 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2022-26904 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 3 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

2680 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

zephyrproject zephyr

Of the 4 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest EPSS percentile: 0.06701.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2026-10654.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.