vciy

CVE-2025-6751

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Linksys E8450 HTTP POST Request portal.cgi set_device_language buffer overflow

CVE-2025-67513 of 4 sources documented this
22

rank 22 = 0 + 22 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00730  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.7, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$36,400over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$36,400 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.0073 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.0073EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.7 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-06-27, 447 days at 0.01, as of 2026-09-17. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

SonicWall SonicOSPHPCVE-2018-6789CVE-2016-0099Cisco SecureApple Safari6751

This record is one instance of CWE-120, buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow'). The index holds 4490 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running Linksys E8450? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'); CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a…receipt
Published consequencesCWE-120: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Availability: Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 17 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.7 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.0073 · top 47% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byVulDBreceipt
Recorded changes17 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productLinksys E8450receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Linksys E8450 up to 1.2.00.360516. This affects the function set_device_language of the file portal.cgi of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument dut_language leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-119; CWE-120
also scored by
[email protected] 7.4 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X · [email protected] 8.8…

check it yourself vuldb.com vuldb.com vuldb.com github.com github.com linksys.com receipt

Movement the material steps

27 Jun 20250.00082
15 Jun 20260.0064 · scoring model v2026.06.15
17 Sep 20260.0073
Show all 17 observations
27 Jun 20250.00082
3 Jul 20250.00092
29 Jul 20250.00106
3 Sep 20250.00123
27 Oct 20250.00159
23 Nov 20250.0017
24 Nov 20250.00163
5 Dec 20250.00231
31 Jan 20260.0022
13 Mar 20260.00288
23 Mar 20260.00321
13 Apr 20260.00348
23 Apr 20260.00979
15 Jun 20260.0064
17 Jul 20260.00655
28 Aug 20260.00688
17 Sep 20260.0073

17 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.0073Published2025-06-27Index as of2026-09-17

The record had been public for 1 year, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-06-27 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-17 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-120, buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow'). The index holds 4490 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2020-5135 · SonicWall SonicOSonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2019-11043 · PHPonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2018-6789only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2016-0099only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2025-20333 · Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security…only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-31277 · Apple Safarionly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

4490 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-6751.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.