vciy

CVE-2025-64691

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

AVEVA Process Optimization Code Injection

CVE-2025-646914 of 4 sources documented this
24

rank 24 = 0 + 22 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00292  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.8, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$14,600over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$14,600 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.00292 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00292EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-01-16, 241 days at 0.00, as of 2026-09-14. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

MicrosoftGitLabDotNetNuke CMSActiveMQ BrokerCVE-2022-41223SonicWall SMA100064691

This record is one instance of CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'). The index holds 7185 prior instances of this class, 79 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running AVEVA Process Optimization? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-94: Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchprocess optimization 2025receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00292 · top 78% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byicscertreceipt
Recorded changes12 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productAVEVA Process Optimizationreceipt
Published rangesaveva process optimization < 2025receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessrequires low privilegesAVEVA Process OptimizationCWE-94 code injectionAdjacent componentsscope changeFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-94scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow an authenticated miscreant (OS standard user) to tamper with TCL Macro scripts and escalate privileges to OS system, potentially resulting in complete compromise of the model application server. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-94
affected versions
aveva process optimization < 2025
also scored by
[email protected] 9.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X ·…

check it yourself aveva.com softwaresupportsp.aveva.com cisa.gov github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

16 Jan 20260.00018
15 Jun 20260.00293 · scoring model v2026.06.15
14 Sep 20260.00292

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 12 observations
16 Jan 20260.00018
22 Jan 20260.0002
17 Feb 20260.00023
18 Feb 20260.00013
16 Mar 20260.00011
25 Mar 20260.00013
18 May 20260.00015
13 Jun 20260.0001
15 Jun 20260.00293
15 Aug 20260.00298
4 Sep 20260.00305
14 Sep 20260.00292

12 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00292Published2026-01-16Index as of2026-09-14

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2026-06-13 and 2026-06-15 (0.0001 → 0.00293) and the record had been public for 7 months when this index was last written.

Published 2026-01-16 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-14 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'). The index holds 7185 prior instances of this class, 79 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-49704 · Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2021-22205 · GitLabmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2017-9822 · DotNetNuke CMS Fixed in 9.1.1matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2026-34197 · Apache ActiveMQ Brokermatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2022-41223matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2026-15410 · SonicWall SMA1000matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

7185 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

aveva process optimization

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-64691.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.