vciy

CVE-2025-59733

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Heap-buffer-overflow write in FFmpeg EXR dwa_uncompress

CVE-2025-597333 of 4 sources documented this
22

rank 22 = 0 + 22 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00185  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.7, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$8,140over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$8,140 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.8814887365328109 exposure x 0.00185 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00185EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.7 HIGHreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-10-06, 335 days at 0.00, as of 2026-09-06. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

WatchGuardIvanti ConnectVMware ESXiFortinetMicrosoft Windows59733

This record is one instance of CWE-787, out-of-bounds write. The index holds 14893 prior instances of this class, 164 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running FFmpeg? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachreachable from an adjacent network · no privileges required · passive user interaction · high attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality and integrity loss, with impact on subsequent systemsreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-787 Out-of-bounds Writereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-787: Integrity: Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Unexpected State[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in8.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.7 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00185 · top 92% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byGooglereceipt
Recorded changes15 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productFFmpegreceipt
Fixed in8.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

When decoding an OpenEXR file that uses DWAA or DWAB compression, there's an implicit assumption that all image channels have the same pixel type (and size), and that if there are four channels, the first four are "B", "G", "R" and "A". The channel parsing code can be found in decode_header. The buffer td->uncompressed_data is allocated in decode_block based on the xsize, ysize and computed current_channel_offset. The function dwa_uncompress then assumes at [5] that if there are 4 channels, these are "B", "G", "R" and "A", and in the calculations at [6] and [7] that all channels are of the same type, which matches the type of the main color channels. If we set the main color channel receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

s to a 4-byte type and add duplicate or unknown channels of the 2-byte EXR_HALF type, then the addition at [7] will increment the pointer by 4-bytes * xsize * nb_channels, which will exceed the allocated buffer. We recommend upgrading to version 8.0 or beyond.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-787
also scored by
[email protected] 8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

check it yourself issuetracker.google.com receipt

Movement the material steps

6 Oct 20250.00019
15 Jun 20260.00169 · scoring model v2026.06.15
6 Sep 20260.00185
Show all 15 observations
6 Oct 20250.00019
12 Oct 20250.00022
7 Nov 20250.00024
13 Dec 20250.00026
5 Feb 20260.00037
4 Mar 20260.00018
16 Mar 20260.00022
2 May 20260.00023
12 May 20260.00022
11 Jun 20260.00024
15 Jun 20260.00169
1 Jul 20260.00167
2 Jul 20260.00171
18 Jul 20260.00172
6 Sep 20260.00185

15 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00185Published2025-10-06Index as of2026-09-06

The record had been public for 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-10-06 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-06 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-787, out-of-bounds write. The index holds 14893 prior instances of this class, 164 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-14733 · WatchGuard Fireware OSmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-0282 · Ivanti Connect Secureonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-22225 · VMware ESXionly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-22457 · Ivanti Connect Secureonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-21762 · Fortinet FortiProxyonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-30051 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

14893 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

ffmpeg

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-59733.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.