vciy

CVE-2025-5830

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial DLB_SlaveRegister Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CVE-2025-58304 of 4 sources documented this
32

rank 32 = 0 + 22 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00375  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.8, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

18 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$18,700over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$18,700 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.00375 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00375EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-06-26, 446 days at 0.00, as of 2026-09-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2015-3113FortinetVMware vCenterFacebook WhatsAppMicrosoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows5830

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachreachable from an adjacent network · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflowreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-122: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Execute…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchmaxicharger ac elite business c50 firmware 1.39.51; maxicharger ac elite business c50 firmware 1.56.51; maxicharger ac pro firmware 1.39.51; maxicharger ac pro firmware 1.56.51…receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00375 · top 69% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth9 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byzdireceipt
Recorded changes18 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productAutel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercialreceipt
Published rangesautel maxicharger ac elite business c50 firmware < 1.39.51; autel maxicharger ac elite business c50 firmware < 1.56.51; autel maxicharger ac pro firmware < 1.39.51; autel maxicharger ac pro firmware < 1.56.51receipt
Show all 18 published ranges
autel maxicharger ac elite business c50 firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger ac elite business c50 firmware < 1.56.51
autel maxicharger ac pro firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger ac pro firmware < 1.56.51
autel maxicharger ac ultra firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger ac ultra firmware < 1.56.51
autel maxicharger dc compact mobile firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger dc compact mobile firmware < 1.56.51
autel maxicharger dc compact pedestal firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger dc compact pedestal firmware < 1.56.51
autel maxicharger dc fast firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger dc fast firmware < 1.56.51
autel maxicharger dc hipower firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger dc hipower firmware < 1.56.51
autel maxicharger dh480 firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger dh480 firmware < 1.56.51
autel maxicharger single charger firmware < 1.39.51
autel maxicharger single charger firmware < 1.56.51

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Adjacent networkno credentials, no interactionAutel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commer…CWE-122 weaknessFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-122data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial DLB_SlaveRegister Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial EV chargers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of DLB_SlaveRegister messages. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-26327. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-122
affected versions
autel maxicharger ac elite business c50 firmware < 1.39.51; autel maxicharger ac elite business c50 firmware < 1.56.51; autel maxicharger ac pro firmware < 1.39.51; and 15 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 8.8 CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself zerodayinitiative.com receipt

Movement the material steps

26 Jun 20250.0005
15 Jun 20260.00326 · scoring model v2026.06.15
15 Sep 20260.00375
Show all 18 observations
26 Jun 20250.0005
1 Jul 20250.0006
20 Jul 20250.00063
27 Jul 20250.00069
1 Sep 20250.00067
11 Sep 20250.00085
25 Oct 20250.00108
8 Nov 20250.00051
18 Nov 20250.00156
21 Nov 20250.00051
3 Dec 20250.00044
19 Jan 20260.0005
29 Jan 20260.00063
28 Feb 20260.00071
21 Apr 20260.0016
15 Jun 20260.00326
5 Aug 20260.00338
15 Sep 20260.00375

18 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00375Published2025-06-25Index as of2026-09-15

The record had been public for 1 year, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-06-25 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2015-3113matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2015receipt
CVE-2023-27997 · Fortinet FortiOS-6K7Kmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2024-38812 · VMware vCenter Servermatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2019-3568 · Facebook WhatsApp for Androidmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2024-30051 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-23376 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3216 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-5830.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.