vciy

CVE-2025-52905

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

TOTOLINK X6000R Argument Injection Vulnerability

CVE-2025-529054 of 4 sources documented this
23

rank 23 = 2 + 19 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.08050  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 4

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 23

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 23

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$246,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$246,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.0805 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.0805EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7 HIGHreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-09-24, 338 days at 0.08, as of 2026-08-28. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

PTC WindchillN-able N-centralPalo AltoCVE-2022-47966AtlassianCVE-2022-2949952905

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Palo_alto7 HIGHreceipt
NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Scoring standard
Palo_altoCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running TOTOLINK X6000R? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · passive user interaction · low attack complexity · attack requirements presentreceipt
ImpactComplete availability loss, with impact on subsequent systemsreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-20 Improper Input Validationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-20: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Confidentiality: Read Memory, Read Files or Directories…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 28 Aug 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.0805 · top 5% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bypalo_altoreceipt
Recorded changes18 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productTOTOLINK X6000Rreceipt
Published rangestotolink x6000r firmware <= 9.4.0cu.1360_b20241207receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in TOTOLINK X6000R allows Flooding.This issue affects X6000R: through V9.4.0cu.1360_B20241207. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-20
affected versions
totolink x6000r firmware <= 9.4.0cu.1360_b20241207
also scored by
[email protected] 7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:X/RE:X/U:X

The CNA scored it 7 and NVD 7.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself totolink.net github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

24 Sep 20250.00306
15 Jun 20260.07597 · scoring model v2026.06.15
28 Aug 20260.0805
Show all 18 observations
24 Sep 20250.00306
29 Sep 20250.00375
9 Oct 20250.00157
25 Oct 20250.00172
30 Nov 20250.002
18 Dec 20250.00203
23 Jan 20260.00262
19 Feb 20260.00179
20 Feb 20260.00172
3 Mar 20260.00156
21 Mar 20260.00142
19 Apr 20260.00146
29 Apr 20260.00107
29 May 20260.00119
9 Jun 20260.00135
15 Jun 20260.07597
19 Jun 20260.07767
28 Aug 20260.0805

18 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.0805Published2025-09-23Index as of2026-08-28

The record had been public for 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-09-23 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-28 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-12569 · PTC Windchill PDMLinkmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-8876 · N-able N-centralmatches 3 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-3400 · Palo Alto Networks PAN-OSonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2022-47966nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-22515 · Atlassian Confluence Data Centeronly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-29499nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2022receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

13347 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

totolink x6000r

Of the 2 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names argument injection.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-52905.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.