vciy

CVE-2025-34207

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Insecure SSH Client Configuration

CVE-2025-342074 of 4 sources documented this
29

rank 29 = 0 + 25 + 0 + 4 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00665  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 4

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

2 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposureunder $1over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

under $1 = $4.99M incident cost x 0 exposure x 0.00665 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00665EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.9 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-09-30, 334 days at 0.01, as of 2026-08-30. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2021-30116CVE-2014-1812RockwellCVE-2020-29583CVE-2017-924834207

This record is one instance of CWE-522, insufficiently protected credentials. The index holds 1501 prior instances of this class, 5 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
VulnCheck7.9 HIGHreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Scoring standard
VulnCheckCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Vasion Print Virtual Appliance Host? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactNo confidentiality, integrity or availability impactreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-522 Insufficiently Protected Credentials; CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Functionreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-522: Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in22.0.1049; 20.0.2786receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.9 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.00665 · top 50% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byVulnCheckreceipt
Recorded changes16 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productVasion Print Virtual Appliance Host; Vasion Print Applicationreceipt
Published rangesvasion virtual appliance application < 20.0.2786; vasion virtual appliance host < 22.0.1049receipt
Fixed in22.0.1049; 20.0.2786receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to 22.0.1049 and Application prior to 20.0.2786 (VA and SaaS deployments) configure the SSH client within Docker instances with the following options: `UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null`, `StrictHostKeyChecking=no`, and `ForwardAgent yes`. These settings disable verification of the remote host’s SSH key and automatically forward the developer’s SSH‑agent to any host that matches the configured wildcard patterns. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

As a result, an attacker who can reach a single compromised container can cause the container to connect to a malicious SSH server, capture the forwarded private keys, and use those keys for unrestricted lateral movement across the environment. This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2024-027 — Insecure Secure Shell (SSH) Configuration.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-306; CWE-522
affected versions
vasion virtual appliance application < 20.0.2786; vasion virtual appliance host < 22.0.1049
also scored by
[email protected] 7.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

The CNA scored it 7.9 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself pierrekim.github.io help.printerlogic.com help.printerlogic.com vulncheck.com receipt

Movement the material steps

30 Sep 20250.00041
15 Jun 20260.00607 · scoring model v2026.06.15
30 Aug 20260.00665
Show all 16 observations
30 Sep 20250.00041
4 Oct 20250.00045
5 Oct 20250.00059
31 Oct 20250.00064
6 Dec 20250.00067
29 Jan 20260.00087
25 Feb 20260.00055
26 Feb 20260.00053
9 Mar 20260.00079
12 Apr 20260.00123
25 Apr 20260.00141
5 May 20260.00134
4 Jun 20260.00147
15 Jun 20260.00607
25 Jun 20260.00621
30 Aug 20260.00665

16 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00665Published2025-09-29Index as of2026-08-30

The record had been public for 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-09-29 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-30 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-522, insufficiently protected credentials. The index holds 1501 prior instances of this class, 5 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2021-30116only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2014-1812only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2014receipt
CVE-2021-22681 · Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix…only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2020-29583only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2017-9248only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2017receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

1501 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-34207.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.