vciy

CVE-2025-32382

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Snowflake credentials logged by the Metabase backend

CVE-2025-323823 of 4 sources documented this
5

rank 5 = 0 + 5 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00377  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 1.8, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposureunder $1over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

under $1 = $4.99M incident cost x 0 exposure x 0.00377 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00377EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity1.8 LOWreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-04-11, 513 days at 0.00, as of 2026-09-06. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Microsoft WindowsSamsung Mobile32382

This record is one instance of CWE-532, insertion of sensitive information into log file. The index holds 1245 prior instances of this class, 2 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running metabase? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · active user interaction · low attack complexity · attack requirements presentreceipt
ImpactNo confidentiality, integrity or availability impactreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-532 Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log Filereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-532: Confidentiality: Read Application Data[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 6 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA1.8 LOWreceipt
Exploit probability0.00377 · top 68% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes23 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productmetabasereceipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Metabase is an open source Business Intelligence and Embedded Analytics tool. When admins change Snowflake connection details in Metabase (either updating a password or changing password to private key or vice versa), Metabase would not always purge older Snowflake connection details from the application database. In order to remove older and stale connection details, Metabase would try one connection method at a time and purge all the other connection methods from the application database. When Metabase found a connection that worked, it would log (log/infof "Successfully connected, migrating to: %s" (pr-str test-details)) which would then print the username and password to the logger. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

This is fixed in 52.17.1, 53.9.5 and 54.1.5 in both the OSS and enterprise editions. Versions 51 and lower are not impacted.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-532
also scored by
[email protected] 1.8 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

check it yourself github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

11 Apr 20250.00039
15 Jun 20260.00308 · scoring model v2026.06.15
6 Sep 20260.00377
Show all 23 observations
11 Apr 20250.00039
16 Apr 20250.00051
12 May 20250.00055
17 Jun 20250.00058
10 Aug 20250.00075
6 Sep 20250.00048
7 Sep 20250.00047
18 Sep 20250.00055
4 Nov 20250.00059
14 Nov 20250.00057
18 Nov 20250.00087
21 Nov 20250.00057
14 Dec 20250.00061
25 Dec 20250.0008
4 Jan 20260.00089
25 Jan 20260.00097
4 Feb 20260.00353
19 May 20260.00126
21 May 20260.00183
15 Jun 20260.00308
1 Jul 20260.00337
12 Jul 20260.00362
6 Sep 20260.00377

23 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00377Published2025-04-10Index as of2026-09-06

The record had been public for 1 year, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-04-10 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-06 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-532, insertion of sensitive information into log file. The index holds 1245 prior instances of this class, 2 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-24984 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-21492 · Samsung Mobile Devicesonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

1245 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-32382.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.