vciy

CVE-2025-22443

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Arkcompiler Ets Runtime has an out-of-bounds read vulnerability

CVE-2025-224434 of 4 sources documented this
16

rank 16 = 0 + 14 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00138  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$1,660over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$1,660 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.00138 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00138EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity3.3 LOWreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-03-04, 514 days at 0.00, as of 2026-07-31. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

LinuxApple macOSCVE-2020-11899CVE-2016-4523polkitMicrosoft Windows22443

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
OpenHarmony3.3 LOWreceipt
NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
What it costs
OpenHarmonyPartial availability lossreceipt
NVDComplete availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running OpenHarmony? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-125 Out-of-bounds Readreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-125: Confidentiality: Read Memory; Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 31 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA3.3 LOWreceipt
CVSS, NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00138 · top 96% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byOpenHarmonyreceipt
Recorded changes18 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productOpenHarmonyreceipt
Published rangesopenatom openharmony >= 4.1.0 <= 5.0.2receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

in OpenHarmony v5.0.2 and prior versions allow a local attacker cause DOS through out-of-bounds read. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-125
affected versions
openatom openharmony >= 4.1.0 <= 5.0.2
also scored by
[email protected] 3.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

The CNA scored it 3.3 and NVD 5.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself gitee.com receipt

Movement the material steps

4 Mar 20250.00043
17 Mar 20250.00013 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00129 · scoring model v2026.06.15
31 Jul 20260.00138
Show all 18 observations
4 Mar 20250.00043
17 Mar 20250.00013
5 Apr 20250.00015
11 May 20250.00017
4 Jul 20250.00024
31 Jul 20250.00017
1 Aug 20250.00019
12 Aug 20250.0002
28 Sep 20250.00022
18 Nov 20250.00033
21 Nov 20250.00024
28 Nov 20250.00026
29 Dec 20250.00028
12 Apr 20260.00057
14 Apr 20260.00099
15 Jun 20260.00129
8 Jul 20260.00133
31 Jul 20260.00138

18 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00138Published2025-03-04Index as of2026-07-31

The record had been public for 1 year, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-03-04 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-31 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-53150 · Linuxmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2022-22674 · Apple macOSmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2020-11899matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2016-4523matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2021-4034 · polkitmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2023-36424 · Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

9767 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-22443.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.