vciy

CVE-2025-20292

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Cisco NXOS Software Command Injection Vulnerability

CVE-2025-202923 of 4 sources documented this
12

rank 12 = 1 + 11 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.03166  ·  without this subject the record ranks 11

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 4.4, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 1

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 12

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 12

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 12

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$67,600over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$67,600 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.42806422275080447 exposure x 0.03166 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.03166EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity4.4 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-08-28, 342 days at 0.03, as of 2026-08-05. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2021-27102CVE-2017-6884Soliton SystemsActiveMQ BrokerCVE-2023-43208CVE-2021-2710420292

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Cisco NX-OS Software? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality and integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 5 Aug 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA4.4 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.03166 · top 13% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byciscoreceipt
Recorded changes23 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productCisco NX-OS Software; Cisco NX-OS System Software in ACI Mode; Cisco Unified Computing System (Managed)receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute a command injection attack on the underlying operating system of an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid user credentials on the affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by entering crafted input as the argument of an affected CLI command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read and write files on the underlying operating system with the privileges of a non-root user account. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

File system access is limited to the permissions that are granted to that non-root user account.

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-78
also scored by
[email protected] 4.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

check it yourself sec.cloudapps.cisco.com receipt

Movement the material steps

28 Aug 20250.00289
15 Jun 20260.01876 · scoring model v2026.06.15
5 Aug 20260.03166

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 23 observations
28 Aug 20250.00289
29 Aug 20250.00397
30 Aug 20250.005
2 Sep 20250.00455
28 Sep 20250.00485
21 Oct 20250.00524
3 Nov 20250.00596
18 Nov 20250.00551
21 Nov 20250.00596
27 Dec 20250.00503
23 Jan 20260.00301
24 Jan 20260.00221
26 Jan 20260.00205
4 Feb 20260.00164
23 Mar 20260.00175
2 May 20260.00191
13 May 20260.0018
23 May 20260.00152
13 Jun 20260.00113
15 Jun 20260.01876
23 Jun 20260.03221
28 Jul 20260.0314
5 Aug 20260.03166

23 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.03166Published2025-08-27Index as of2026-08-05

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2026-06-13 and 2026-06-15 (0.00113 → 0.01876) and the record had been public for 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-08-27 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-05 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2021-27102matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2017-6884matches 4 of 8KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2026-25108 · Soliton Systems K.K. FileZenmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-34197 · Apache ActiveMQ Brokermatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2023-43208matches 3 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-27104matches 3 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

cisco nx-os software

Of the 13 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names nxos.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: computed, pro@dim2000

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-20292.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.