vciy

CVE-2025-15501

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System getCmd WriterHandle.getCmd os command injection

CVE-2025-155014 of 4 sources documented this
27

rank 27 = 2 + 23 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.07012  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.3, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 4

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$350,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$350,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.07012 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.07012EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-01-10, 239 days at 0.07, as of 2026-09-06. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

BeyondTrustBerriAI litellmPalo AltoPHPCVE-2024-51378CVE-2023-4320815501

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Sangfor Operation and Maintenance…? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'); CWE-77 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements…receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 6 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.07012 · top 6% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byVulDBreceipt
Recorded changes14 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productSangfor Operation and Maintenance Management Systemreceipt
Published rangessangfor operation and maintenance security management system <= 3.0.8receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability was determined in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System up to 3.0.8. Impacted is the function WriterHandle.getCmd of the file /isomp-protocol/protocol/getCmd. This manipulation of the argument sessionPath causes os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-77; CWE-78
affected versions
sangfor operation and maintenance security management system <= 3.0.8
also scored by
[email protected] 8.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X · [email protected] 9.8…

check it yourself vuldb.com vuldb.com vuldb.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

10 Jan 20260.00153
15 Jun 20260.06369 · scoring model v2026.06.15
6 Sep 20260.07012
Show all 14 observations
10 Jan 20260.00153
15 Jan 20260.00216
23 Jan 20260.011
10 Feb 20260.01071
20 Feb 20260.0122
18 Mar 20260.01274
21 Mar 20260.00327
11 May 20260.00374
7 Jun 20260.01008
8 Jun 20260.00937
15 Jun 20260.06369
8 Aug 20260.06479
28 Aug 20260.0662
6 Sep 20260.07012

14 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.07012Published2026-01-09Index as of2026-09-06

The record had been public for 7 months when this index was last written.

Published 2026-01-09 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-06 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-1731 · BeyondTrust Remote Support(RS) & Privileged…matches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-42271 · BerriAI litellmmatches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2024-9474 · Palo Alto Networks Cloud NGFWmatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-4577 · PHPonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-51378only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-43208only 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

sangfor operation and maintenance management system

Of the 5 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest EPSS percentile: 0.9339.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-15501.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.