vciy

CVE-2025-0672

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Authentication Bypass in Multiple WSO2 Products via Stale FIDO Credential Association

CVE-2025-06724 of 4 sources documented this
15

rank 15 = 0 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00215  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 3.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$4,590over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$4,590 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.42806422275080447 exposure x 0.00215 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00215EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity3.3 LOWreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-09-24, 338 days at 0.00, as of 2026-08-28. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

MicrosoftIvanti ICSPaperCut NGcheckpointConfiguratorjfrog artifactory0672

This record is one instance of CWE-287, improper authentication. The index holds 4979 prior instances of this class, 49 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
WSO23.3 LOWreceipt
NVD3.8 LOWreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running WSO2 Identity Server as Key Manager? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality and integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-287 Improper Authenticationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-287: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Read Application Data, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in5.10.0; 5.10.0.338; 5.10.0.345; 5.11.0.394; 2.0.0.389receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA3.3 LOWreceipt
CVSS, NVD3.8 LOWreceipt
Exploit probability0.00215 · top 88% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth3 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byWSO2receipt
Recorded changes17 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productWSO2 Identity Server as Key Manager; WSO2 Identity Server; WSO2 Open Banking IAMreceipt
Published rangeswso2 identity server 5.10.0; wso2 identity server 5.11.0; wso2 identity server as key manager 5.10.0; wso2 open banking iam 2.0.0receipt
Fixed in5.10.0; 5.10.0.338; 5.10.0.345; 5.11.0.394; 2.0.0.389receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products when FIDO authentication is enabled. When a user account is deleted, the system does not automatically remove associated FIDO registration data. If a new user account is later created using the same username, the system may associate the new account with the previously registered FIDO device. This flaw may allow a previously deleted user to authenticate using their FIDO credentials and impersonate the newly created user, resulting in unauthorized access. The vulnerability applies only to deployments that utilize FIDO-based authentication. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
3.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
weakness
CWE-287
affected versions
wso2 identity server 5.10.0; wso2 identity server 5.11.0; wso2 identity server as key manager 5.10.0; and 1 more, listed in full below
also scored by
3.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

The CNA scored it 3.3 and NVD 3.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself security.docs.wso2.com receipt

Movement the material steps

24 Sep 20250.00039
15 Jun 20260.00206 · scoring model v2026.06.15
28 Aug 20260.00215
Show all 17 observations
24 Sep 20250.00039
29 Sep 20250.00047
4 Oct 20250.00049
18 Oct 20250.00052
25 Oct 20250.00056
30 Nov 20250.00055
23 Jan 20260.00064
19 Feb 20260.00031
20 Feb 20260.0003
3 Mar 20260.00033
19 Apr 20260.00036
29 May 20260.00039
9 Jun 20260.0004
15 Jun 20260.00206
19 Jun 20260.00204
1 Jul 20260.00202
28 Aug 20260.00215

17 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00215Published2025-09-23Index as of2026-08-28

The record had been public for 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-09-23 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-28 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-287, improper authentication. The index holds 4979 prior instances of this class, 49 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-49706 · Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-46805 · Ivanti ICSmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-27351 · PaperCut NGmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2026-50751 · checkpoint Quantum Security Gatewaymatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-61884 · Oracle Configuratormatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2026-42018 · jfrog artifactorymatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

4979 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2025-0672.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.