vciy

CVE-2024-8270

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

macOS Rocket.Chat: TCC Policy Bypass via Dylib Injection Due to Missing Code Signing Flags and Dangerous Entitlements

CVE-2024-82703 of 4 sources documented this
14

rank 14 = 0 + 14 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00207  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.5, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 0

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$6,320over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$6,320 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.00207 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00207EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-06-11, 460 days at 0.00, as of 2026-09-14. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2021-40655jfrog artifactoryAgile PLMpolkitFortinet FortiOS,Apple iOS8270

This record is one instance of CWE-863, incorrect authorization. The index holds 4015 prior instances of this class, 21 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Rocket.Chat Desktop? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-863 Incorrect Authorizationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-863: Confidentiality: Read Application Data, Read Files or Directories; Integrity: Modify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 14 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00207 · top 89% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byPentrazereceipt
Recorded changes17 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productRocket.Chat Desktopreceipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessrequires low privilegesRocket.Chat DesktopCWE-863 incorrect authorizationConfidentiality lossC:Hexploits CWE-863data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

The macOS Rocket.Chat application is affected by a vulnerability that allows bypassing Transparency, Consent, and Control (TCC) policies, enabling the exploitation or abuse of permissions specified in its entitlements (e.g., microphone, camera, automation, network client). Since Rocket.Chat was not signed with the Hardened Runtime nor set to enforce Library Validation, it is vulnerable to DYLIB injection attacks, which can lead to unauthorized actions or escalation of permissions. Consequently, an attacker gains capabilities that are not permitted by default under the Sandbox and its application profile. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-863
also scored by
5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

check it yourself pentraze.com pentraze.com receipt

Movement the material steps

11 Jun 20259e-05
15 Jun 20260.00177 · scoring model v2026.06.15
14 Sep 20260.00207
Show all 17 observations
11 Jun 20259e-05
16 Jun 20250.0001
12 Jul 20250.00012
17 Aug 20250.00014
10 Oct 20250.00017
6 Nov 20250.00012
18 Nov 20250.00019
21 Nov 20250.00014
4 Jan 20260.00016
13 Feb 20260.00017
24 Feb 20260.00023
6 Mar 20260.00024
6 Apr 20260.00064
15 Jun 20260.00177
30 Jun 20260.00181
31 Aug 20260.00192
14 Sep 20260.00207

17 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00207Published2025-06-10Index as of2026-09-14

The record had been public for 1 year, 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-06-10 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-14 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-863, incorrect authorization. The index holds 4015 prior instances of this class, 21 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2021-40655matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2026-42016 · jfrog artifactorymatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2024-21287 · Oracle Agile PLM Frameworkmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2021-3560 · polkitmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2018-13382 · Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxymatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2025-24200 · Apple iOS and iPadOSmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

4015 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

advisory published by pentraze.com

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-8270.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.