vciy

CVE-2024-5642

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Buffer overread when using an empty list with SSLContext.set_npn_protocols()

CVE-2024-56422 of 4 sources documented this
unranked

No rank

rank@v1 withholds a number for this record

nothing this rule scores is held for this record, so there is no ordering to state. That is a fact about the sources, not a finding about the software.

Hindsight · the state

0.00744EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severitynot scored
Harmnot stated
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-06-28, 717 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running Python Software Foundation CPython? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

ReachNo CVSS vector in held sources, so no reach or impact can be stated.
Weakness classNo CWE mapping in held sources.

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in3.9.24; 3.10.0b1receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

Exploit probability0.00744 · top 47% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned byPSFreceipt
Recorded changes41 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productPython Software Foundation CPythonreceipt
Fixed in3.9.24; 3.10.0b1receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

CPython 3.9 and earlier doesn't disallow configuring an empty list ("[]") for SSLContext.set_npn_protocols() which is an invalid value for the underlying OpenSSL API. This results in a buffer over-read when NPN is used (see CVE-2024-5535 for OpenSSL). This vulnerability is of low severity due to NPN being not widely used and specifying an empty list likely being uncommon in-practice (typically a protocol name would be configured). receipt

check it yourself jbp.io github.com mail.python.org github.com openwall.com github.com +2 morereceipt

Movement the material steps

28 Jun 20240.00045
17 Mar 20250.00473 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00744 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 41 observations
28 Jun 20240.00045
2 Jul 20240.00044
17 Mar 20250.00473
23 Mar 20250.00527
27 Mar 20250.01684
28 Mar 20250.00527
29 Mar 20250.01684
30 Mar 20250.00527
13 Apr 20250.00571
15 Apr 20250.00414
23 Apr 20250.00486
5 Aug 20250.001
6 Aug 20250.00095
16 Aug 20250.00098
27 Aug 20250.00095
8 Oct 20250.00138
17 Oct 20250.00142
30 Oct 20250.00138
16 Nov 20250.00187
18 Nov 20250.00872
20 Nov 20250.00187
18 Dec 20250.00192
21 Dec 20250.00165
24 Dec 20250.00161
26 Dec 20250.00165
27 Dec 20250.00192
9 Jan 20260.00187
18 Jan 20260.00165
23 Jan 20260.00192
5 Feb 20260.00187
18 Feb 20260.00192
23 Feb 20260.00165
28 Feb 20260.00192
13 Mar 20260.00187
21 Mar 20260.00165
24 Mar 20260.00192
6 Apr 20260.00187
9 Apr 20260.00161
14 Apr 20260.00192
27 Apr 20260.00187
15 Jun 20260.00744

41 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00744Published2024-06-27Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-28 and 2025-03-29 (0.00527 → 0.01684) and the record had been public for 1 year, 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-06-27 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-5642.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.