vciy

CVE-2024-4598

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Information Disclosure in Multiple WSO2 Products Due to Improper Handling in Enrich Mediator

CVE-2024-45984 of 4 sources documented this
22

rank 22 = 0 + 16 + 0 + 6 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00320  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.5, from the CNA  ·  without this subject the record ranks 6

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

6 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$9,770over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$9,770 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.0032 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.0032EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-09-23, 339 days at 0.00, as of 2026-08-28. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running WSO2 API Manager? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-1259 Improper Restriction of Security Token Assignmentreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-1259: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control: Modify Files or Directories, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Gain Privileges or Assume…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in3.2.0; 3.2.0.422; 3.2.1.42; 4.1.0.152; 4.3.0.55; 1.2.0; 1.2.0.157; 4.1.0.95receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.0032 · top 75% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byWSO2receipt
Recorded changes17 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productWSO2 API Manager; WSO2 Micro Integratorreceipt
Published rangeswso2 api manager >= 3.2.0 < 3.2.0.422; wso2 api manager >= 3.2.1 < 3.2.1.42; wso2 api manager >= 4.1.0 < 4.1.0.152; wso2 api manager >= 4.3.0 < 4.3.0.55receipt
Show all 6 published ranges
wso2 api manager >= 3.2.0 < 3.2.0.422
wso2 api manager >= 3.2.1 < 3.2.1.42
wso2 api manager >= 4.1.0 < 4.1.0.152
wso2 api manager >= 4.3.0 < 4.3.0.55
wso2 micro integrator >= 1.2.0 < 1.2.0.157
wso2 micro integrator >= 4.1.0 < 4.1.0.95
Fixed in3.2.0; 3.2.0.422; 3.2.1.42; 4.1.0.152; 4.3.0.55; 1.2.0; 1.2.0.157; 4.1.0.95receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to improper implementation of the enrich mediator. Authenticated users may be able to view unintended business data from other mediation contexts because the internal state is not properly isolated or cleared between executions. This vulnerability does not impact user credentials or access tokens but may lead to leakage of sensitive business information handled during message flows. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

weakness
CWE-1259
affected versions
wso2 api manager >= 3.2.0 < 3.2.0.422; wso2 api manager >= 3.2.1 < 3.2.1.42; wso2 api manager >= 4.1.0 < 4.1.0.152; and 3 more, listed in full below
also scored by
6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

check it yourself security.docs.wso2.com receipt

Movement the material steps

23 Sep 20250.00046
15 Jun 20260.00292 · scoring model v2026.06.15
28 Aug 20260.0032
Show all 17 observations
23 Sep 20250.00046
24 Sep 20250.00042
29 Sep 20250.00047
7 Oct 20250.0005
25 Oct 20250.00058
30 Nov 20250.00067
23 Jan 20260.00082
19 Feb 20260.00053
20 Feb 20260.00051
3 Mar 20260.0006
19 Apr 20260.00076
29 Apr 20260.00093
29 May 20260.00101
9 Jun 20260.00136
15 Jun 20260.00292
19 Jun 20260.00299
28 Aug 20260.0032

17 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.0032Published2025-09-23Index as of2026-08-28

The record had been public for 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-09-23 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-28 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-4598.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.