vciy

CVE-2024-45606

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Improper authorization on muting of alert rules in sentry

CVE-2024-456064 of 4 sources documented this
13

rank 13 = 0 + 11 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00358  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 4.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 11

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$12,800over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$12,800 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.7179585840212677 exposure x 0.00358 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00358EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.1 HIGHreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-09-18, 644 days at 0.00, as of 2026-06-24. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M7.1 HIGHreceipt
NVD4.3 MEDIUMreceipt
What it costs
GitHub_MPartial confidentiality loss; complete integrity lossreceipt
NVDPartial integrity lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running getsentry sentry? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality loss; complete integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Keyreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-639: Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchsentry 24.9.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.1 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD4.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00358 · top 70% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes40 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productgetsentry sentryreceipt
Published rangessentry >= 23.4.0 < 24.9.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires low privilegesgetsentry sentryCWE-639 weaknessIntegrity lossI:Hexploits CWE-639data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Sentry is a developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring platform. An authenticated user can mute alert rules from arbitrary organizations and projects with a know rule ID. The user does not need to be a member of the organization or have permissions on the project. In our review, we have identified no instances where alerts have been muted by unauthorized parties. A patch was issued to ensure authorization checks are properly scoped on requests to mute alert rules. Authenticated users who do not have the necessary permissions are no longer able to mute alerts. Sentry SaaS users do not need to take any action. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

Self-Hosted Sentry users should upgrade to version **24.9.0** or higher. The rule mute feature was generally available as of 23.6.0 but users with early access may have had the feature as of 23.4.0. Affected users are advised to upgrade to version 24.9.0. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
weakness
CWE-639
affected versions
sentry >= 23.4.0 < 24.9.0
also scored by
[email protected] 7.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

The CNA scored it 7.1 and NVD 4.3. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

18 Sep 20240.00045
17 Mar 20250.00061 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00348 · scoring model v2026.06.15
24 Jun 20260.00358

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 40 observations
18 Sep 20240.00045
27 Sep 20240.00053
17 Mar 20250.00061
29 Mar 20250.00128
30 Mar 20250.00061
13 Apr 20250.00066
15 Apr 20250.00061
23 Apr 20250.00069
11 May 20250.00063
23 May 20250.00068
1 Jun 20250.00075
3 Jun 20250.00087
4 Jun 20250.00078
13 Jun 20250.0008
1 Jul 20250.00089
4 Jul 20250.00099
14 Jul 20250.00116
1 Aug 20250.00131
4 Aug 20250.00116
1 Sep 20250.00131
5 Sep 20250.00116
1 Oct 20250.00131
4 Oct 20250.00116
26 Oct 20250.00331
27 Oct 20250.00253
1 Nov 20250.00229
4 Nov 20250.00253
18 Nov 20250.00122
21 Nov 20250.00253
1 Dec 20250.00229
4 Dec 20250.00253
17 Dec 20250.00344
1 Jan 20260.00229
4 Jan 20260.00344
1 Feb 20260.00229
4 Feb 20260.00344
1 Mar 20260.00229
4 Mar 20260.00344
15 Jun 20260.00348
24 Jun 20260.00358

40 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00358Published2024-09-17Index as of2026-06-24

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-11-18 and 2025-11-21 (0.00122 → 0.00253) and the record had been public for 1 year, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-09-17 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-24 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

getsentry sentry

Of the 3 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names muting rules.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-45606.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.