vciy

CVE-2024-45306

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

heap-buffer-overflow in Vim

CVE-2024-453064 of 4 sources documented this
16

rank 16 = 0 + 14 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00298  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$8,540over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$8,540 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.5743756121449558 exposure x 0.00298 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00298EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity4.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-09-03, 650 days at 0.00, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

FortinetMicrosoft WindowsAdobe AcrobatCVE-2015-3113Microsoft Windows45306

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M4.5 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
What it costs
GitHub_MPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
NVDComplete availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running vim? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · no privileges required · user interaction required · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflowreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-122: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Execute…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchvim 9.1.0707receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA4.5 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00298 · top 77% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes18 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productvimreceipt
Published rangesvim >= 9.1.0038 < 9.1.0707receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Patch v9.1.0038 optimized how the cursor position is calculated and removed a loop, that verified that the cursor position always points inside a line and does not become invalid by pointing beyond the end of a line. Back then we assumed this loop is unnecessary. However, this change made it possible that the cursor position stays invalid and points beyond the end of a line, which would eventually cause a heap-buffer-overflow when trying to access the line pointer at the specified cursor position. It's not quite clear yet, what can lead to this situation that the cursor points to an invalid position. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

That's why patch v9.1.0707 does not include a test case. The only observed impact has been a program crash. This issue has been addressed in with the patch v9.1.0707. All users are advised to upgrade.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-122; CWE-787
affected versions
vim >= 9.1.0038 < 9.1.0707
also scored by
[email protected] 4.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

The CNA scored it 4.5 and NVD 5.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

3 Sep 20240.00045
17 Mar 20250.00085 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00298 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 18 observations
3 Sep 20240.00045
2 Oct 20240.00044
17 Mar 20250.00085
29 Mar 20250.00091
30 Mar 20250.00098
15 Apr 20250.00058
8 May 20250.00076
19 May 20250.00081
29 May 20250.0009
29 Jun 20250.00095
16 Jul 20250.00104
17 Jul 20250.00095
2 Sep 20250.00104
5 Sep 20250.00095
11 Oct 20250.0005
18 Nov 20250.00162
21 Nov 20250.0005
15 Jun 20260.00298

18 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00298Published2024-09-02Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 1 year, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-09-02 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-25249 · Fortinet FortiSwitchManagermatches 4 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-24985 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 4 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-24993 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 4 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2021-21017 · Adobe Acrobat Readermatches 4 of 10KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2015-3113matches 3 of 9KEV listed · 2015receipt
CVE-2024-30051 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 3 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3216 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

vim

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-45306.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.