vciy

CVE-2024-41710

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A vulnerability in the Mitel 6800 Series, 6900 Series, and 6900w Series SIP Phones, including the 6970 Conference Unit, through R6.4.0.HF1…

CVE-2024-417103 of 4 sources documented this
75

rank 75 = 40 + 18 + 2 + 9 + 6

rank@v1 · act now

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.41646 · CISA KEV listed  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.2, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 57

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-09-20  ·  without this subject the record ranks 73

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

15 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 66

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

CISA remediation date held  ·  without this subject the record ranks 69

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$2.08Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$573,000on 2025-09-20, the last material move, 11 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$2.08M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.41646 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.41646EPSSKEV · LISTED
Severity7.2 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationin the wild · KEVreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 81 days at 0.42, as of 2026-09-04. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

GNU InetutilsAtlassianCVE-2016-10033Mikrotik RouterOS41710

This record is one instance of CWE-88, improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection'). The index holds 455 prior instances of this class, 4 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-88 Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-88: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Other: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Alter Execution Logic, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data[email protected]
Ransomware campaign useUnknown to CISAreceipt

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 4 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
CISA remediation statusoverdue since 2025-03-05receipt
CISA required actionApply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.receipt
Published to CISA KEV184 daysderived

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed, 2025-02-12.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed2025-02-12receipt
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.2 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.41646 · top 1% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth9 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes44 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesMitel; Mitel 6940w sip firmware; Mitel 6930w sip firmware; and 6 morereceipt
Published rangesmitel 6970 firmware <= 6.4.0.136; mitel 6940w sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136; mitel 6930w sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136; mitel 6920w sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136receipt
Show all 15 published ranges
mitel 6970 firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6940w sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6930w sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6920w sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6920 sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6915 sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6910 sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6905 sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6940 sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6930 sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6873i sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6869i sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6867i sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6865i sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136
mitel 6863i sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the Mitel 6800 Series, 6900 Series, and 6900w Series SIP Phones, including the 6970 Conference Unit, through R6.4.0.HF1 (R6.4.0.136) could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privilege to conduct an argument injection attack, due to insufficient parameter sanitization during the boot process. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands within the context of the system. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-88
affected versions
mitel 6970 firmware <= 6.4.0.136; mitel 6940w sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136; mitel 6930w sip firmware <= 6.4.0.136; and 12 more, listed in full below
also scored by
6.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself mitel.com github.com mitel.com receipt

Dated events

2025-02-12Added to CISA KEV2025-03-05CISA remediation due2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.01 to 0.152025-03-19EPSS moved 0.15 to 0.412026-06-15EPSS moved 0.20 to 0.41

Movement the material steps

13 Aug 20240.00043
17 Mar 20250.15452 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
19 Mar 20250.4147
20 Mar 20250.15452
27 Mar 20250.4147
28 Mar 20250.15452
29 Mar 20250.4147
30 Mar 20250.15452
15 Apr 20250.07023 · crossed 0.10
20 Sep 20250.19683 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.41201 · scoring model v2026.06.15
17 Jul 20260.41646

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 33 observations
13 Aug 20240.00043
14 Aug 20240.00045
13 Feb 20250.00235
19 Feb 20250.01183
17 Mar 20250.15452
19 Mar 20250.4147
20 Mar 20250.15452
27 Mar 20250.4147
28 Mar 20250.15452
29 Mar 20250.4147
30 Mar 20250.15452
15 Apr 20250.07023
28 Apr 20250.07111
15 May 20250.06444
18 May 20250.06764
28 May 20250.08515
27 Jun 20250.0891
12 Jul 20250.08196
20 Sep 20250.19683
6 Nov 20250.201
9 Nov 20250.21138
18 Nov 20250.15795
21 Nov 20250.21138
25 Dec 20250.21573
7 Jan 20260.21138
18 Feb 20260.21573
27 Feb 20260.21138
10 Mar 20260.19695
27 Apr 20260.2011
10 May 20260.19695
15 Jun 20260.41201
25 Jun 20260.4161
17 Jul 20260.41646

33 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.41646Published2024-08-12CISA KEV2025-02-12Index as of2026-09-04

Listed by CISA 184 days after it published, exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-17 and 2025-03-19 (0.15452 → 0.4147) and the record had been public for 2 years when this index was last written.

No material movement in 49 days as of the last ingest this index recorded.

Published 2024-08-12 receipt · CISA KEV 2025-02-12 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-04 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-88, improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection'). The index holds 455 prior instances of this class, 4 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-24061 · GNU Inetutilsmatches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2022-36804 · Atlassian Bitbucket Servermatches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2016-10033matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2026-86060 · Mikrotik RouterOSnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

455 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-41710.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.