vciy

CVE-2024-38877

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A vulnerability has been identified in Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Domain Controller R9.2 (All versions)…

CVE-2024-388774 of 4 sources documented this
29

rank 29 = 0 + 22 + 0 + 7 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00187  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 7

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

7 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$9,330over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$9,330 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.00187 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00187EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.2 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-08-06, 678 days at 0.00, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Siemens8.2 HIGHreceipt
NVD8.8 HIGHreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Siemens Omnivise T3000 Application Server…? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · high privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-312 Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Informationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-312: Confidentiality: Read Application Data[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.2 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00187 · top 91% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth7 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bysiemensreceipt
Recorded changes22 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productSiemens Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2; Siemens Omnivise T3000 Domain Controller R9.2; Siemens Omnivise T3000 Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) R9.2…receipt
Published rangessiemens omnivise t3000 application server >= r9.2; siemens omnivise t3000 domain controller >= r9.2; siemens omnivise t3000 network intrusion detection system <= 9.2; siemens omnivise t3000 product data management >= r9.2receipt
Show all 7 published ranges
siemens omnivise t3000 application server >= r9.2
siemens omnivise t3000 domain controller >= r9.2
siemens omnivise t3000 network intrusion detection system <= 9.2
siemens omnivise t3000 product data management >= r9.2
siemens omnivise t3000 terminal server <= 9.2
siemens omnivise t3000 thin client >= r9.2
siemens omnivise t3000 whitelisting server >= r9.2

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessrequires high privilegesSiemens Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP3CWE-312 weaknessAdjacent componentsscope changeFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-312scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability has been identified in Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Domain Controller R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Product Data Management (PDM) R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP3 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 R8.2 SP4 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Security Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Terminal Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Thin Client R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Whitelisting Server R9.2 (All versions). The affected devices stores initial system credentials without sufficient protection. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

An attacker with remote shell access or physical access could retrieve the credentials leading to confidentiality loss allowing the attacker to laterally move within the affected network.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-312
affected versions
siemens omnivise t3000 application server >= r9.2; siemens omnivise t3000 domain controller >= r9.2; siemens omnivise t3000 network intrusion detection system <= 9.2; and 4 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 8.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X ·…

The CNA scored it 8.2 and NVD 8.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself cert-portal.siemens.com receipt

Movement the material steps

6 Aug 20240.00043
17 Mar 20250.00016 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00187 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 22 observations
6 Aug 20240.00043
17 Mar 20250.00016
29 Mar 20250.00022
30 Mar 20250.00016
7 Apr 20250.00017
15 Apr 20250.00016
18 Apr 20250.00017
28 Apr 20250.00019
29 May 20250.0002
10 Sep 20250.00061
13 Sep 20250.00071
1 Nov 20250.00079
11 Nov 20250.00081
18 Nov 20250.00021
21 Nov 20250.00081
24 Nov 20250.00079
9 Dec 20250.00067
22 Dec 20250.00083
23 Dec 20250.00068
1 Apr 20260.00083
15 Apr 20260.00068
15 Jun 20260.00187

22 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00187Published2024-08-02Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-11-18 and 2025-11-21 (0.00021 → 0.00081) and the record had been public for 1 year, 10 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-08-02 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

Of the 4 records in this advisory that state one, this holds the lowest EPSS percentile: 0.08328.

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-38877.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.