vciy

CVE-2024-37164

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

CVAT SSRF via custom cloud storage endpoints

CVE-2024-371644 of 4 sources documented this
23

rank 23 = 0 + 21 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00347  ·  without this subject the record ranks 23

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 23

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 23

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$12,400over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$12,400 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.7179585840212677 exposure x 0.00347 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00347EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.1 HIGHreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-06-14, 731 days at 0.00, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

HTTP ServerCisco Unifiedvrana adminerGitLabSonicWall SMA100037164

This record is one instance of CWE-918, server-side request forgery (ssrf). The index holds 3592 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M7.1 HIGHreceipt
NVD8.5 HIGHreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running cvat-ai cvat? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality loss; complete integrity loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)receipt
Published consequencesCWE-918: Confidentiality: Read Application Data; Integrity: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchcomputer vision annotation tool 2.14.3receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.1 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00347 · top 72% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes13 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productcvat-ai cvatreceipt
Published rangescvat computer vision annotation tool >= 2.1.0 < 2.14.3receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires low privilegescvat-ai cvatCWE-918 server-side request forge…Adjacent componentsscope changeIntegrity lossI:Hexploits CWE-918scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT) is an interactive video and image annotation tool for computer vision. CVAT allows users to supply custom endpoint URLs for cloud storages based on Amazon S3 and Azure Blob Storage. Starting in version 2.1.0 and prior to version 2.14.3, an attacker with a CVAT account can exploit this feature by specifying URLs whose host part is an intranet IP address or an internal domain name. By doing this, the attacker may be able to probe the network that the CVAT backend runs in for HTTP(S) servers. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

In addition, if there is a web server on this network that is sufficiently API-compatible with an Amazon S3 or Azure Blob Storage endpoint, and either allows anonymous access, or allows authentication with credentials that are known by the attacker, then the attacker may be able to create a cloud storage linked to this server. They may then be able to list files on the server; extract files from the server, if these files are of a type that CVAT supports reading from cloud storage (media data (such as images/videos/archives), importable annotations or datasets, task/project backups); and/or overwrite files on this server with exported annotations/datasets/backups. The exact capabilities of the attacker will depend on how the internal server is configured. Users should upgrade to CVAT 2.14.3 to receive a patch. In this release, the existing SSRF mitigation measures are applied to requests to cloud providers, with access to intranet IP addresses prohibited by default. Some workarounds are also available. One may use network security solutions such as virtual networks or firewalls to prohibit network access from the CVAT backend to unrelated servers on your internal network and/or require authentication for access to internal servers.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
weakness
CWE-918
affected versions
cvat computer vision annotation tool >= 2.1.0 < 2.14.3
also scored by
[email protected] 7.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N

The CNA scored it 7.1 and NVD 8.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

14 Jun 20240.00043
17 Mar 20250.00093 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00347 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 13 observations
14 Jun 20240.00043
22 Jan 20250.00046
17 Mar 20250.00093
29 Mar 20250.00148
30 Mar 20250.00101
9 Apr 20250.00112
15 Apr 20250.0006
22 Jul 20250.00254
26 Jul 20250.00209
2 Nov 20250.00284
18 Nov 20250.00117
21 Nov 20250.00284
15 Jun 20260.00347

13 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00347Published2024-06-13Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-11-18 and 2025-11-21 (0.00117 → 0.00284) and the record had been public for 2 years when this index was last written.

Published 2024-06-13 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-918, server-side request forgery (ssrf). The index holds 3592 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2021-40438 · Apache HTTP Servermatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2026-20230 · Cisco Unified Communications Managermatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2021-21311 · vrana adminermatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-22175 · GitLabmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-39935 · GitLabmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2026-15409 · SonicWall SMA1000matches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3592 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

cvat-ai cvat

Of the 2 records in this family, this is the only one that does not hold public proof-of-concept code. That is a fact about what the catalogue records, not a finding about exposure.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-37164.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.