vciy

CVE-2024-24576

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Rusts's `std::process::Command` did not properly escape arguments of batch files on Windows

CVE-2024-245764 of 4 sources documented this
48

rank 48 = 18 + 25 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.20342  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 10.0, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 23

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 48

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 43

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 48

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$1.02Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$1.02M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.20342 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.20342EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity10 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.00044 to 0.20342 across 47 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2024-51378ivanti SentryArista Networkskestra-io kestraCVE-2023-43208CVE-2021-2710424576

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running rust-lang rust? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'); CWE-88 Improper Neutralization of Argument…receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchrust 1.77.2receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 7 public repositories, 2024-04-09.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 7 public repositories2024-04-09receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA10 CRITICALreceipt
CVSS, NVD10 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.20342 · top 3% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 2 vendorsderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes50 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productrust-lang rustreceipt
Published rangesrust-lang rust < 1.77.2; fedoraproject fedora 38; fedoraproject fedora 39; fedoraproject fedora 40receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionrust-lang rustCWE-78 OS command injectionAdjacent componentsscope changeFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-78scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Rust is a programming language. The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the Rust standard library prior to version 1.77.2 did not properly escape arguments when invoking batch files (with the `bat` and `cmd` extensions) on Windows using the `Command`. An attacker able to control the arguments passed to the spawned process could execute arbitrary shell commands by bypassing the escaping. The severity of this vulnerability is critical for those who invoke batch files on Windows with untrusted arguments. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

No other platform or use is affected. The `Command::arg` and `Command::args` APIs state in their documentation that the arguments will be passed to the spawned process as-is, regardless of the content of the arguments, and will not be evaluated by a shell. This means it should be safe to pass untrusted input as an argument. On Windows, the implementation of this is more complex than other platforms, because the Windows API only provides a single string containing all the arguments to the spawned process, and it's up to the spawned process to split them. Most programs use the standard C run-time argv, which in practice results in a mostly consistent way arguments are splitted. One exception though is `cmd.exe` (used among other things to execute batch files), which has its own argument splitting logic. That forces the standard library to implement custom escaping for arguments passed to batch files. Unfortunately it was reported that our escaping logic was not thorough enough, and it was possible to pass malicious arguments that would result in arbitrary shell execution. Due to the complexity of `cmd.exe`, we didn't identify a solution that would correctly escape arguments in all cases. To maintain our API guarantees, we improved the robustness of the escaping code, and changed the `Command` API to return an `InvalidInput` error when it cannot safely escape an argument. This error will be emitted when spawning the process. The fix is included in Rust 1.77.2. Note that the new escaping logic for batch files errs on the conservative side, and could reject valid arguments. Those who implement the escaping themselves or only handle trusted inputs on Windows can also use the `CommandExt::raw_arg` method to bypass the standard library's escaping logic.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
10 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-78; CWE-88
affected versions
rust-lang rust < 1.77.2; fedoraproject fedora 38; fedoraproject fedora 39; and 1 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 10 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself github.com doc.rust-lang.org doc.rust-lang.org doc.rust-lang.org doc.rust-lang.org doc.rust-lang.org +6 morereceipt

Dated events

2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.00 to 0.802026-06-15EPSS moved 0.81 to 0.20

Movement the material steps

10 Apr 20240.00044
17 Mar 20250.80113 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
1 May 20250.62714
18 May 20250.7414
29 Aug 20250.84295
15 Jun 20260.20342 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 47 observations
10 Apr 20240.00044
21 Apr 20240.00046
17 Mar 20250.80113
19 Mar 20250.80003
20 Mar 20250.80113
27 Mar 20250.80003
28 Mar 20250.80113
29 Mar 20250.80003
30 Mar 20250.80113
15 Apr 20250.72474
26 Apr 20250.7313
27 Apr 20250.70943
1 May 20250.62714
4 May 20250.70943
18 May 20250.7414
1 Jun 20250.73361
4 Jun 20250.7414
14 Jun 20250.80999
28 Jun 20250.81372
1 Jul 20250.80842
4 Jul 20250.81372
1 Aug 20250.80842
3 Aug 20250.83441
4 Aug 20250.83876
29 Aug 20250.84295
1 Sep 20250.83877
4 Sep 20250.84295
11 Sep 20250.83876
1 Oct 20250.83441
4 Oct 20250.83876
1 Nov 20250.83441
4 Nov 20250.83876
18 Nov 20250.80113
21 Nov 20250.83876
1 Dec 20250.83441
4 Dec 20250.83876
7 Dec 20250.82902
15 Dec 20250.83876
1 Jan 20260.83441
4 Jan 20260.83876
6 Jan 20260.80474
1 Feb 20260.7991
4 Feb 20260.79212
1 Mar 20260.78603
4 Mar 20260.79212
28 Apr 20260.80539
15 Jun 20260.20342

47 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.20342Published · Public PoC2024-04-09Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 2 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-04-09 receipt · Public PoC 2024-04-09 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-51378matches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2026-10520 · ivanti Sentrymatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-16812 · Arista Networks VeloCloud Orchestrator On-Premmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-49869 · kestra-io kestramatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2023-43208matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-27104matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

rust-lang rust

Of the 2 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names rusts std process.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-24576.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.