vciy

CVE-2024-23829

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

aiohttp's HTTP parser (the python one, not llhttp) still overly lenient about separators

CVE-2024-238294 of 4 sources documented this
20

rank 20 = 0 + 16 + 0 + 4 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01029  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 4

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

2 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$22,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$22,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.42806422275080447 exposure x 0.01029 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01029EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-01-31, 895 days at 0.01, as of 2026-07-14. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Kludex starletteConfiguratorSAP NetWeaverCVE-2023-41265CVE-2023-4836523829

This record is one instance of CWE-444, inconsistent interpretation of http requests ('http request/response smuggling'). The index holds 426 prior instances of this class, 5 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running aio-libs aiohttp? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-444: Integrity, Non-Repudiation, Access Control: Unexpected State, Hide Activities, Bypass Protection Mechanism[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchaiohttp 3.9.2receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.01029 · top 38% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 2 vendorsderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes26 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productaio-libs aiohttpreceipt
Published rangesaiohttp < 3.9.2; fedoraproject fedora 39receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Security-sensitive parts of the Python HTTP parser retained minor differences in allowable character sets, that must trigger error handling to robustly match frame boundaries of proxies in order to protect against injection of additional requests. Additionally, validation could trigger exceptions that were not handled consistently with processing of other malformed input. Being more lenient than internet standards require could, depending on deployment environment, assist in request smuggling. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

The unhandled exception could cause excessive resource consumption on the application server and/or its logging facilities. This vulnerability exists due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-47627. Version 3.9.2 fixes this vulnerability.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
weakness
CWE-444
affected versions
aiohttp < 3.9.2; fedoraproject fedora 39
also scored by
[email protected] 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com lists.fedoraproject.org lists.fedoraproject.org receipt

Movement the material steps

31 Jan 20240.00045
17 Mar 20250.00736 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.0102 · scoring model v2026.06.15
14 Jul 20260.01029
Show all 26 observations
31 Jan 20240.00045
7 Feb 20240.00074
8 Feb 20240.00073
29 Dec 20240.00086
4 Feb 20250.00158
2 Mar 20250.00134
17 Mar 20250.00736
29 Mar 20250.02472
30 Mar 20250.00736
15 Apr 20250.00236
19 Apr 20250.0023
23 Jul 20250.00236
8 Aug 20250.0023
4 Nov 20250.0038
18 Nov 20250.01062
21 Nov 20250.00391
24 Nov 20250.0038
17 Dec 20250.0035
28 Dec 20250.0038
16 Feb 20260.00515
19 Apr 20260.00475
23 May 20260.00354
28 May 20260.00488
10 Jun 20260.00475
15 Jun 20260.0102
14 Jul 20260.01029

26 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01029Published2024-01-29Index as of2026-07-14

The record had been public for 2 years, 5 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-01-29 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-14 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-444, inconsistent interpretation of http requests ('http request/response smuggling'). The index holds 426 prior instances of this class, 5 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-48710 · Kludex starlettematches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-61884 · Oracle Configuratormatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2022-22536 · SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platformmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2023-41265matches 3 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-48365matches 3 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

426 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

aio-libs aiohttp

Of the 9 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names parser python one.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-23829.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.