vciy

CVE-2024-23108

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute…

CVE-2024-231084 of 4 sources documented this
60

rank 60 = 27 + 25 + 1 + 7 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.78375  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-10-30  ·  without this subject the record ranks 59

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

7 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 53

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 60

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$3.91Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$153,000on 2025-11-21, the last material move, 9 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$3.91M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.78375 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.78375EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.7 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 91 days at 0.78, as of 2026-09-14. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2024-51378ivanti SentryArista NetworksFortinetkestra-io kestra23108

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Fortinet9.7 CRITICALreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
What it costs
FortinetComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Fortinet FortiSIEM? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 14 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories, 2024-05-20.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories2024-05-20receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA9.7 CRITICALreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.78375 · top 0.44% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byfortinetreceipt
Recorded changes44 · last 18 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productFortinet FortiSIEMreceipt
Published rangesfortinet fortisiem >= 6.4.0 <= 6.4.2; fortinet fortisiem >= 6.5.0 <= 6.5.2; fortinet fortisiem >= 6.6.0 <= 6.6.3; fortinet fortisiem >= 6.7.0 <= 6.7.8receipt
Show all 7 published ranges
fortinet fortisiem >= 6.4.0 <= 6.4.2
fortinet fortisiem >= 6.5.0 <= 6.5.2
fortinet fortisiem >= 6.6.0 <= 6.6.3
fortinet fortisiem >= 6.7.0 <= 6.7.8
fortinet fortisiem >= 7.0.0 <= 7.0.2
fortinet fortisiem 7.1.0
fortinet fortisiem 7.1.1

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionFortinet FortiSIEMCWE-78 OS command injectionAdjacent componentsscope changeFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-78scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via via crafted API requests. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-78
affected versions
fortinet fortisiem >= 6.4.0 <= 6.4.2; fortinet fortisiem >= 6.5.0 <= 6.5.2; fortinet fortisiem >= 6.6.0 <= 6.6.3; and 4 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 10 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

The CNA scored it 9.7 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself fortiguard.com receipt

Dated events

2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.00 to 0.752026-06-15EPSS moved 0.91 to 0.78

Movement the material steps

8 Feb 20240.00068
17 Mar 20250.75175 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Apr 20250.89786
22 Apr 20250.91616 · crossed 0.90
24 Apr 20250.89828 · crossed 0.90
30 Oct 20250.92388 · crossed 0.90
18 Nov 20250.88762 · crossed 0.90
21 Nov 20250.91825 · crossed 0.90
15 Jun 20260.78375 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2026.06.15
14 Sep 20260.78375
Show all 41 observations
8 Feb 20240.00068
29 May 20240.00078
5 Jan 20250.00077
11 Feb 20250.00124
9 Mar 20250.00126
17 Mar 20250.75175
19 Mar 20250.7514
20 Mar 20250.75175
23 Mar 20250.7514
24 Mar 20250.75175
27 Mar 20250.7514
28 Mar 20250.75175
29 Mar 20250.76516
30 Mar 20250.75175
15 Apr 20250.89786
22 Apr 20250.91616
24 Apr 20250.89828
29 Apr 20250.89786
12 Jun 20250.89571
26 Jun 20250.88633
9 Jul 20250.8839
16 Aug 20250.88444
18 Aug 20250.88469
21 Aug 20250.88415
17 Sep 20250.88681
21 Oct 20250.88415
30 Oct 20250.92388
1 Nov 20250.91076
18 Nov 20250.88762
21 Nov 20250.91825
12 Jan 20260.90389
15 Jan 20260.91253
17 Jan 20260.90389
18 Jan 20260.91253
19 Jan 20260.90389
4 Feb 20260.91825
12 Mar 20260.90389
14 Jun 20260.90607
15 Jun 20260.78375
3 Sep 20260.78229
14 Sep 20260.78375

41 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.78375Published2024-02-05Public PoC2024-05-20Index as of2026-09-14

The record had been public for 2 years, 7 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-02-05 receipt · Public PoC 2024-05-20 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-14 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-51378matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2026-10520 · ivanti Sentrymatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-16812 · Arista Networks VeloCloud Orchestrator On-Premmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-25089 · Fortinet FortiSandboxmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-39808 · Fortinet FortiSandboxmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-49869 · kestra-io kestramatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

fortinet fortisiem

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-23108.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.