vciy

CVE-2024-21607

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Junos OS: MX Series and EX9200 Series: If the "tcp-reset" option used in an IPv6 filter, matched packets are accepted instead of rejected

CVE-2024-216074 of 4 sources documented this
21

rank 21 = 0 + 13 + 0 + 8 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00308  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 8

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

10 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$3,700over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$3,700 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.00308 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00308EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-01-18, 958 days at 0.00, as of 2026-09-02. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running Juniper Networks Junos OS? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-447 Unimplemented or Unsupported Feature in UIreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-447: Other: Varies by Context, Unexpected State[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in20.4R3-S7; 21.1R3-S5; 21.2R3-S5; 21.3R3-S4; 21.4R3-S4; 22.1R3-S2; 22.2R3-S2; 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3; 22.4R1-S2, 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00308 · top 76% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byjuniperreceipt
Recorded changes15 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productJuniper Networks Junos OSreceipt
Published rangesjuniper junos < 20.4; juniper junos 20.4; juniper junos 21.1; juniper junos 21.2receipt
Show all 10 published ranges
juniper junos < 20.4
juniper junos 20.4
juniper junos 21.1
juniper junos 21.2
juniper junos 21.3
juniper junos 21.4
juniper junos 22.1
juniper junos 22.2
juniper junos 22.3
juniper junos 22.4
Fixed in20.4R3-S7; 21.1R3-S5; 21.2R3-S5; 21.3R3-S4; 21.4R3-S4; 22.1R3-S2; 22.2R3-S2; 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3; 22.4R1-S2, 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

An Unsupported Feature in the UI vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series and EX9200 Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause partial impact to the integrity of the device. If the "tcp-reset" option is added to the "reject" action in an IPv6 filter which matches on "payload-protocol", packets are permitted instead of rejected. This happens because the payload-protocol match criteria is not supported in the kernel filter causing it to accept all packets without taking any other action. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

As a fix the payload-protocol match will be treated the same as a "next-header" match to avoid this filter bypass. This issue doesn't affect IPv4 firewall filters. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series and EX9200 Series: * All versions earlier than 20.4R3-S7; * 21.1 versions earlier than 21.1R3-S5; * 21.2 versions earlier than 21.2R3-S5; * 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S4; * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S4; * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S2; * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S2; * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3; * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R1-S2, 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
weakness
CWE-447
affected versions
juniper junos < 20.4; juniper junos 20.4; juniper junos 21.1; and 7 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

check it yourself supportportal.juniper.net first.org receipt

Movement the material steps

18 Jan 20240.00043
17 Mar 20250.00176 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.0031 · scoring model v2026.06.15
2 Sep 20260.00308
Show all 15 observations
18 Jan 20240.00043
19 Jan 20240.00046
12 Dec 20240.00050
17 Mar 20250.00176
29 Mar 20250.0028
30 Mar 20250.00176
15 Apr 20250.00032
16 Jul 20250.00044
20 Aug 20250.00034
4 Sep 20250.00049
18 Nov 20250.00183
21 Nov 20250.00049
7 Dec 20250.0004
15 Jun 20260.0031
2 Sep 20260.00308

15 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00308Published2024-01-12Index as of2026-09-02

The record had been public for 2 years, 7 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-01-12 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-02 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

juniper networks junos os

Of the 2 records in this family, this is the only one holding a stated fix version: 20.4R3-S7; 21.1R3-S5; 21.2R3-S5; 21.3R3-S4; 21.4R3-S4; 22.1R.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-21607.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.