vciy

CVE-2024-20467

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A vulnerability in the implementation of the IPv4 fragmentation reassembly code in Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote…

CVE-2024-204674 of 4 sources documented this
43

rank 43 = 15 + 22 + 1 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00980  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.6, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-10-30  ·  without this subject the record ranks 42

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

3 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 38

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 43

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$29,900over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$76,900on 2025-08-25, the last material move, 10 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$29,900 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.0098 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.0098EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.6 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 17 days at 0.01, as of 2026-07-02. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Cisco IOSCisco IOS and IOSCisco IOS20467

This record is one instance of CWE-399. The index holds 2695 prior instances of this class, 11 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Cisco IOS XE Software? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-399receipt
Published consequencesMITRE publishes no common consequences for this weakness.[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 2 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository, 2024-09-28.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository2024-09-28receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.6 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.6 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.0098 · top 39% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byciscoreceipt
Recorded changes39 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productCisco IOS XE Softwarereceipt
Published rangescisco ios xe 17.11.99sw; cisco ios xe 17.12.1; cisco ios xe 17.12.1areceipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionCisco IOS XE SoftwareCWE-399 weaknessAdjacent componentsscope changeAvailability lossA:Hexploits CWE-399scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the implementation of the IPv4 fragmentation reassembly code in Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper management of resources during fragment reassembly. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending specific sizes of fragmented packets to an affected device or through a Virtual Fragmentation Reassembly (VFR)-enabled interface on an affected device. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. Note: This vulnerability affects Cisco ASR 1000 Series Aggregation Services Routers and Cisco cBR-8 Converged Broadband Routers if they are running Cisco IOS XE Software Release 17.12.1 or 17.12.1a.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.6 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-399
affected versions
cisco ios xe 17.11.99sw; cisco ios xe 17.12.1; cisco ios xe 17.12.1a
also scored by
[email protected] 8.6 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

check it yourself sec.cloudapps.cisco.com receipt

Dated events

2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.00 to 0.342025-03-28EPSS moved 0.47 to 0.102026-06-15EPSS moved 0.14 to 0.01

Movement the material steps

26 Sep 20240.00043
17 Mar 20250.33847 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
20 Mar 20250.10108
23 Mar 20250.33847
27 Mar 20250.46935
28 Mar 20250.10108
29 Mar 20250.33847
30 Mar 20250.10108
15 Apr 20250.07449 · crossed 0.10
1 May 20250.10651 · crossed 0.10
30 Jul 20250.09143 · crossed 0.10
25 Aug 20250.11662 · crossed 0.10
18 Nov 20250.22329
15 Jun 20260.00987 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
2 Jul 20260.0098

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 36 observations
26 Sep 20240.00043
4 Oct 20240.00046
17 Mar 20250.33847
20 Mar 20250.10108
23 Mar 20250.33847
27 Mar 20250.46935
28 Mar 20250.10108
29 Mar 20250.33847
30 Mar 20250.10108
15 Apr 20250.07449
21 Apr 20250.09644
1 May 20250.10651
31 May 20250.11466
11 Jun 20250.10086
22 Jul 20250.13723
30 Jul 20250.09143
25 Aug 20250.11662
2 Oct 20250.1721
14 Oct 20250.11662
15 Oct 20250.1721
24 Oct 20250.11662
25 Oct 20250.1721
27 Oct 20250.11662
28 Oct 20250.1721
29 Oct 20250.11662
30 Oct 20250.1721
3 Nov 20250.16902
18 Nov 20250.22329
21 Nov 20250.16902
30 Nov 20250.21241
27 Dec 20250.17487
28 Dec 20250.21241
16 Mar 20260.17314
9 Jun 20260.141
15 Jun 20260.00987
2 Jul 20260.0098

36 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.0098Published2024-09-25Public PoC2024-09-28Index as of2026-07-02

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-20 and 2025-03-23 (0.10108 → 0.33847) and the record had been public for 1 year, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-09-25 receipt · Public PoC 2024-09-28 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-02 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-399. The index holds 2695 prior instances of this class, 11 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2018-0154 · Cisco IOSmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-0156 · Cisco IOS and IOS XEmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2017-12231 · Cisco IOSmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2017-12237 · Cisco IOS and IOS XEmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2017-6627 · Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XEmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2018-0161 · Cisco IOSmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2018receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

2695 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

cisco ios xe software

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: computed, pro@dim2000

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-20467.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.