vciy

CVE-2024-10278

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

ESAFENET CDG ReUserOrganiseService.java sql injection

CVE-2024-102784 of 4 sources documented this
27

rank 27 = 0 + 25 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00599  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$17,200over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$17,200 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.5743756121449558 exposure x 0.00599 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00599EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-10-24, 644 days at 0.01, as of 2026-07-30. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Palo AltoBerriAI litellmMetabaseSangoma SwitchvoxFreePBX endpointFortinet10278

This record is one instance of CWE-89, improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection'). The index holds 20889 prior instances of this class, 31 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
VulDB5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Scoring standard
VulDBCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running ESAFENET CDG? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-89: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Confidentiality: Read Application Data; Authentication: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 30 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.00599 · top 53% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byVulDBreceipt
Recorded changes23 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productESAFENET CDGreceipt
Published rangesesafenet cdg 5receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability was found in ESAFENET CDG 5. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file /com/esafenet/servlet/user/ReUserOrganiseService.java. The manipulation of the argument userId leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-89
affected versions
esafenet cdg 5
also scored by
[email protected] 5.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X · [email protected] 6.3…

The CNA scored it 5.3 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself vuldb.com vuldb.com vuldb.com flowus.cn receipt

Movement the material steps

24 Oct 20240.00045
17 Mar 20250.00055 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00569 · scoring model v2026.06.15
30 Jul 20260.00599
Show all 23 observations
24 Oct 20240.00045
5 Nov 20240.00138
17 Mar 20250.00055
19 Mar 20250.00062
22 Mar 20250.00069
29 Mar 20250.00099
30 Mar 20250.00069
2 Apr 20250.00106
15 Apr 20250.00045
19 May 20250.00052
29 May 20250.00058
9 Jun 20250.00079
28 Jun 20250.00082
9 Jul 20250.00092
19 Jul 20250.00102
9 Aug 20250.00111
19 Aug 20250.0013
18 Nov 20250.00308
21 Nov 20250.0013
1 Dec 20250.00072
14 Mar 20260.00097
15 Jun 20260.00569
30 Jul 20260.00599

23 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00599Published2024-10-23Index as of2026-07-30

The record had been public for 1 year, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-10-23 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-30 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-89, improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection'). The index holds 20889 prior instances of this class, 31 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-9465 · Palo Alto Networks Expeditionmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2026-42208 · BerriAI litellmmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-72898 · Metabasematches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-9586 · Sangoma Switchvox SMB Editionmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-57819 · FreePBX endpointmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-48788 · Fortinet FortiClientEMSonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

20889 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-10278.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.