vciy

CVE-2024-0235

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

EventON (Free < 2.2.8, Premium < 4.5.5) - Unauthenticated Email Address Disclosure

CVE-2024-02354 of 4 sources documented this
39

rank 39 = 21 + 13 + 1 + 4 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.37957  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-12-18  ·  without this subject the record ranks 38

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

2 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 39

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$455,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$396,000on 2025-11-21, the last material move, 6 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$455,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.37957 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.37957EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.00052 to 0.37957 across 39 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Cisco SecureDassaultGoogle ChromegrafanaDebian redisApple macOS0235

This record is one instance of CWE-862, missing authorization. The index holds 10017 prior instances of this class, 12 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running EventON? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-862 Missing Authorizationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-862: Confidentiality: Read Application Data, Read Files or Directories; Integrity: Modify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in4.5.5; 2.2.7receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories, 2024-06-03.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories2024-06-03receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.37957 · top 2% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byWPScanreceipt
Recorded changes42 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productEventONreceipt
Published rangesmyeventon eventon < 2.2.7; myeventon eventon >= 4.0 < 4.5.5receipt
Fixed in4.5.5; 2.2.7receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

The EventON WordPress plugin before 4.5.5, EventON WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 do not have authorisation in an AJAX action, allowing unauthenticated users to retrieve email addresses of any users on the blog receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-862
affected versions
myeventon eventon < 2.2.7; myeventon eventon >= 4.0 < 4.5.5
also scored by
5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

check it yourself wpscan.com receipt

Dated events

2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.01 to 0.612026-06-15EPSS moved 0.87 to 0.38

Movement the material steps

24 Jan 20240.00052
17 Mar 20250.61285 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
20 Mar 20250.48867 · crossed 0.50
23 Mar 20250.55005 · crossed 0.50
28 Mar 20250.48867 · crossed 0.50
29 Mar 20250.50437 · crossed 0.50
30 Mar 20250.48867 · crossed 0.50
15 Apr 20250.80887 · crossed 0.50
18 Nov 20250.48867 · crossed 0.50
21 Nov 20250.81849 · crossed 0.50
15 Jun 20260.37957 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 39 observations
24 Jan 20240.00052
30 Apr 20240.00542
20 Jun 20240.00506
28 Jun 20240.00387
24 Aug 20240.00392
3 Sep 20240.00743
14 Sep 20240.00394
30 Oct 20240.00485
22 Nov 20240.00482
16 Dec 20240.00437
17 Dec 20240.01139
11 Jan 20250.00986
22 Jan 20250.00858
31 Jan 20250.00930
4 Feb 20250.00956
17 Feb 20250.00930
17 Mar 20250.61285
20 Mar 20250.48867
23 Mar 20250.55005
24 Mar 20250.61285
27 Mar 20250.55005
28 Mar 20250.48867
29 Mar 20250.50437
30 Mar 20250.48867
15 Apr 20250.80887
16 Apr 20250.81506
11 May 20250.8042
6 Jun 20250.83095
29 Jun 20250.82249
12 Jul 20250.81288
19 Sep 20250.81849
18 Nov 20250.48867
21 Nov 20250.81849
18 Dec 20250.86784
5 Jan 20260.87324
16 Feb 20260.86512
6 Apr 20260.82267
13 May 20260.86512
15 Jun 20260.37957

39 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.37957Published2024-01-16Public PoC2024-06-03Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2024-12-16 and 2024-12-17 (0.00437 → 0.01139) and the record had been public for 2 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-01-16 receipt · Public PoC 2024-06-03 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-862, missing authorization. The index holds 10017 prior instances of this class, 12 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-20362 · Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security…matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-6205 · Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Aprisomatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2021-37976 · Google Chromematches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-39226 · grafanamatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2022-0543 · Debian redismatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-30657 · Apple macOSmatches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

10017 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

unknown eventon

Of the 3 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names email address.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2024-0235.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.