vciy

CVE-2023-5038

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Unauthenticated DoS

CVE-2023-50384 of 4 sources documented this
29

rank 29 = 0 + 19 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00418  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$12,800over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$12,800 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.00418 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00418EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.7 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2024-06-25, 720 days at 0.00, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

This record is one instance of CWE-703, improper check or handling of exceptional conditions. The index holds 176 prior instances of this class, 3 KEV-listed. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Hanwha_Vision8.7 HIGHreceipt
NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Scoring standard
Hanwha_VisionCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Hanwha Vision Co., Ltd. A-Series…? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactComplete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-703 Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions; CWE-248 Uncaught Exceptionreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-703: Confidentiality, Availability, Integrity: Read Application Data, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Unexpected State[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchane-l6012r firmware 1.41.16; ane-l7012r firmware 1.41.16; ano-l6012r firmware 1.41.16; ano-l6022r firmware 1.41.16; ano-l6082r firmware 1.41.16; ano-l7012r firmware 1.41.16receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.7 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00418 · top 64% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth20 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byHanwha_Visionreceipt
Recorded changes14 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productHanwha Vision Co., Ltd. A-Series, Q-Series, PNM-series Camerareceipt
Published rangeshanwhavision ano-l6012r firmware < 1.41.16; hanwhavision ano-l6022r firmware < 1.41.16; hanwhavision anv-l6012r firmware < 1.41.16; hanwhavision ano-l6082r firmware < 1.41.16receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
hanwhavision ano-l6012r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision ano-l6022r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision anv-l6012r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision ano-l6082r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision ane-l6012r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision anv-l6082r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision ano-l7082r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision ane-l7012r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision anv-l7082r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision ano-l7012r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision ano-l7022r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision anv-l7012r firmware < 1.41.16
hanwhavision pnm-c9022rv firmware < 2.22.02
hanwhavision pnm-9000qb firmware < 2.22.01
hanwhavision pnm-7002vd firmware < 2.22.02
hanwhavision pnm-8082vt firmware < 2.22.00
hanwhavision pnm-9002vq firmware < 2.22.02
hanwhavision pnm-9022v firmware < 2.22.00
hanwhavision pnm-9031rv firmware < 2.22.01
hanwhavision pnm-9084qz firmware < 2.22.02

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

badmonkey, a Security Researcher has found a flaw that allows for a unauthenticated DoS attack on the camera. An attacker runs a crafted URL, nobody can access the web management page of the camera. and must manually restart the device or re-power it. The manufacturer has released patch firmware for the flaw, please refer to the manufacturer's report for details and workarounds. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-248; CWE-703
affected versions
hanwhavision ano-l6012r firmware < 1.41.16; hanwhavision ano-l6022r firmware < 1.41.16; hanwhavision anv-l6012r firmware < 1.41.16; and 17 more, listed in full below
also scored by
8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

The CNA scored it 8.7 and NVD 7.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself hanwhavision.com receipt

Movement the material steps

25 Jun 20240.00043
17 Mar 20250.00234 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00418 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 14 observations
25 Jun 20240.00043
3 Jul 20240.00046
17 Mar 20250.00234
21 Mar 20250.00261
29 Mar 20250.00305
30 Mar 20250.00261
11 Apr 20250.00283
15 Apr 20250.00117
21 Apr 20250.00137
3 Aug 20250.00526
18 Aug 20250.00403
18 Nov 20250.00333
21 Nov 20250.00403
15 Jun 20260.00418

14 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00418Published2024-06-25Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 1 year, 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-06-25 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-703, improper check or handling of exceptional conditions. The index holds 176 prior instances of this class, 3 KEV-listed. [email protected]

CVE-2022-22265 · Samsung Mobile Devicesonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-25370 · Samsung Mobile Devicesonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-25372 · Samsung Mobile Devicesonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2021receipt

176 records in this class held. The six above are ranked by exploit maturity, then recency.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2023-5038.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.