vciy

CVE-2023-40585

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Unauthenticated access to Ironic API

CVE-2023-405854 of 4 sources documented this
21

rank 21 = 0 + 19 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00433  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$12,400over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$12,400 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.5743756121449558 exposure x 0.00433 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00433EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.3 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-08-26, 1098 days at 0.00, as of 2026-08-28. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

MicrosoftCVE-2022-24990CVE-2023-28461CVE-2022-26501Corporationlangflow-ai40585

This record is one instance of CWE-306, missing authentication for critical function. The index holds 3317 prior instances of this class, 54 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M7.3 HIGHreceipt
NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
What it costs
GitHub_MPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running metal3-io ironic-image? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Functionreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-306: Access Control, Other: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchironic-image 1.4.3receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.3 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00433 · top 63% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes16 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productmetal3-io ironic-imagereceipt
Published rangesmetal3 ironic-image < 1.4.3receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

ironic-image is a container image to run OpenStack Ironic as part of Metal³. Prior to version capm3-v1.4.3, if Ironic is not deployed with TLS and it does not have API and Conductor split into separate services, access to the API is not protected by any authentication. Ironic API is also listening in host network. In case the node is not behind a firewall, the API could be accessed by anyone via network without authentication. By default, Ironic API in Metal3 is protected by TLS and basic authentication, so this vulnerability requires operator to configure API without TLS for it to be vulnerable. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

TLS and authentication however should not be coupled as they are in versions prior to capm3-v1.4.3. A patch exists in versions capm3-v1.4.3 and newer. Some workarounds are available. Either configure TLS for Ironic API (`deploy.sh -t ...`, `IRONIC_TLS_SETUP=true`) or split Ironic API and Conductor via configuration change (old implementation, not recommended). With both workarounds, services are configured with httpd front-end, which has proper authentication configuration in place.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-306
affected versions
metal3 ironic-image < 1.4.3
also scored by
[email protected] 7.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

The CNA scored it 7.3 and NVD 7.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

26 Aug 20230.00043
17 Mar 20250.00236 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00367 · scoring model v2026.06.15
28 Aug 20260.00433
Show all 16 observations
26 Aug 20230.00043
2 Sep 20230.00080
25 Jul 20240.00087
31 Aug 20240.00122
26 Sep 20240.00131
17 Dec 20240.00187
4 Feb 20250.00200
17 Mar 20250.00236
29 Mar 20250.00339
30 Mar 20250.00236
15 Apr 20250.00104
18 Nov 20250.00236
21 Nov 20250.00104
20 May 20260.0013
15 Jun 20260.00367
28 Aug 20260.00433

16 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00433Published2023-08-25Index as of2026-08-28

The record had been public for 3 years when this index was last written.

Published 2023-08-25 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-28 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-306, missing authentication for critical function. The index holds 3317 prior instances of this class, 54 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-56164 · Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2022-24990matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-28461matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-26501matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2026-35273 · Oracle Corporation PeopleSoft Enterprise…matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-3248 · langflow-ai langflowmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3317 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2023-40585.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.