vciy

CVE-2023-38555

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Authentication bypass vulnerability in Fujitsu network devices Si-R series and SR-M series allows a network-adjacent unauthenticated attacker to…

CVE-2023-385554 of 4 sources documented this
30

rank 30 = 0 + 22 + 0 + 8 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00372  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 8

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

9 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$18,600over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$18,600 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.00372 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00372EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-07-26, 1097 days at 0.00, as of 2026-07-27. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2023-28461SonicWall SonicOSConcurrentFortinet FortiOS,Fortinet FortiOSOracle Payments38555

This record is one instance of CWE-287, improper authentication. The index holds 4979 prior instances of this class, 49 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Fujitsu Limited Si-R 30B? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachreachable from an adjacent network · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-287 Improper Authenticationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-287: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Read Application Data, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 27 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD8.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00372 · top 69% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth9 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byjpcertreceipt
Recorded changes14 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productFujitsu Limited Si-R 30B; Fujitsu Limited Si-R 130B; Fujitsu Limited Si-R 90brin; Fujitsu Limited Si-R570B; Fujitsu Limited Si-R370B; Fujitsu Limited Si-R220D; Fujitsu Limited Si-R G100…receipt
Published rangesfujitsu si-r g100 firmware <= 02.54; fujitsu si-r g200 firmware <= 02.54; fujitsu si-r g100b firmware <= 04.12; fujitsu si-r g110b firmware <= 04.12receipt
Show all 9 published ranges
fujitsu si-r g100 firmware <= 02.54
fujitsu si-r g200 firmware <= 02.54
fujitsu si-r g100b firmware <= 04.12
fujitsu si-r g110b firmware <= 04.12
fujitsu si-r g200b firmware <= 04.12
fujitsu si-r g210 firmware <= 20.52
fujitsu si-r g211 firmware <= 20.52
fujitsu si-r g120 firmware <= 20.52
fujitsu si-r g121 firmware <= 20.52

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Authentication bypass vulnerability in Fujitsu network devices Si-R series and SR-M series allows a network-adjacent unauthenticated attacker to obtain, change, and/or reset configuration settings of the affected products. Affected products and versions are as follows: Si-R 30B all versions, Si-R 130B all versions, Si-R 90brin all versions, Si-R570B all versions, Si-R370B all versions, Si-R220D all versions, Si-R G100 V02.54 and earlier, Si-R G200 V02.54 and earlier, Si-R G100B V04.12 and earlier, Si-R G110B V04.12 and earlier, Si-R G200B V04.12 and earlier, Si-R G210 V20.52 and earlier, Si-R G211 V20.52 and earlier, Si-R G120 V20.52 and earlier, Si-R G121 V20.52 and earlier, and SR-M 50AP1 receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

all versions.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-287
affected versions
fujitsu si-r g100 firmware <= 02.54; fujitsu si-r g200 firmware <= 02.54; fujitsu si-r g100b firmware <= 04.12; and 6 more, listed in full below

check it yourself fujitsu.com jvn.jp receipt

Movement the material steps

26 Jul 20230.00044
17 Mar 20250.00291 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00332 · scoring model v2026.06.15
27 Jul 20260.00372
Show all 14 observations
26 Jul 20230.00044
4 Aug 20230.00055
27 Aug 20240.00062
5 Jan 20250.00068
17 Mar 20250.00291
29 Mar 20250.00583
30 Mar 20250.00233
15 Apr 20250.00053
18 Nov 20250.00233
21 Nov 20250.00053
20 Apr 20260.00052
22 May 20260.00061
15 Jun 20260.00332
27 Jul 20260.00372

14 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00372Published2023-07-26Index as of2026-07-27

The record had been public for 3 years when this index was last written.

Published 2023-07-26 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-27 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-287, improper authentication. The index holds 4979 prior instances of this class, 49 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-28461matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2024-53704 · SonicWall SonicOSmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-61882 · Oracle Concurrent Processingmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2022-40684 · Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy…matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2020-12812 · Fortinet FortiOSmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2026-46817 · Oracle Paymentsmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

4979 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2023-38555.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.