vciy

CVE-2023-38433

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Fujitsu Real-time Video Transmission Gear "IP series" use hard-coded credentials, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to initialize or…

CVE-2023-384334 of 4 sources documented this
28

rank 28 = 1 + 19 + 0 + 8 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.03722  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 9

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

11 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$114,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$293,000on 2025-11-21, the last material move, 8 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$114,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.03722 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.03722EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.5 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 42 days at 0.04, as of 2026-07-27. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2020-8657Cisco SmartD-Link DNS-320LUnitronicsAtlassianCVE-2021-4420738433

This record is one instance of CWE-798, use of hard-coded credentials. The index holds 1840 prior instances of this class, 12 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Fujitsu Limited IP-HE950E? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-798 Use of Hard-coded Credentialsreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-798: Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, Other: Read Application Data, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Execute Unauthorized…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 27 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.03722 · top 11% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth11 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byjpcertreceipt
Recorded changes34 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productFujitsu Limited IP-HE950E; Fujitsu Limited IP-HE950D; Fujitsu Limited IP-HE900E; Fujitsu Limited IP-HE900D; Fujitsu Limited IP-900E / IP-920E; Fujitsu Limited IP-900D / IP-900ⅡD / IP-920D…receipt
Published rangesfujitsu ip-he950e firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l053; fujitsu ip-he950d firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l053; fujitsu ip-he900e firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l010; fujitsu ip-he900d firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l004receipt
Show all 11 published ranges
fujitsu ip-he950e firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l053
fujitsu ip-he950d firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l053
fujitsu ip-he900e firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l010
fujitsu ip-he900d firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l004
fujitsu ip-900e firmware >= v01l001 <= v02l061
fujitsu ip-920e firmware >= v01l001 <= v02l061
fujitsu ip-900d firmware >= v01l001 <= v02l061
fujitsu ip-900iid firmware >= v01l001 <= v02l061
fujitsu ip-920d firmware >= v01l001 <= v02l061
fujitsu ip-90 firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l013
fujitsu ip-9610 firmware >= v01l001 <= v02l007

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Fujitsu Real-time Video Transmission Gear "IP series" use hard-coded credentials, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to initialize or reboot the products, and as a result, terminate the video transmission. Affected products and versions are as follows: IP-HE950E firmware versions V01L001 to V01L053, IP-HE950D firmware versions V01L001 to V01L053, IP-HE900E firmware versions V01L001 to V01L010, IP-HE900D firmware versions V01L001 to V01L004, IP-900E / IP-920E firmware versions V01L001 to V02L061, IP-900D / IP-900ⅡD / IP-920D firmware versions V01L001 to V02L061, IP-90 firmware versions V01L001 to V01L013, and IP-9610 firmware versions V01L001 to V02L007. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-798
affected versions
fujitsu ip-he950e firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l053; fujitsu ip-he950d firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l053; fujitsu ip-he900e firmware >= v01l001 <= v01l010; and 8 more, listed in full below

check it yourself fujitsu.com jvn.jp receipt

Dated events

2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.00 to 0.372026-06-15EPSS moved 0.53 to 0.03

Movement the material steps

26 Jul 20230.00048
17 Mar 20250.37105 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
29 Mar 20250.78151 · crossed 0.50
30 Mar 20250.43607 · crossed 0.50
15 Apr 20250.59367 · crossed 0.50
18 Nov 20250.43607 · crossed 0.50
21 Nov 20250.53203 · crossed 0.50
15 Jun 20260.0299 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15
27 Jul 20260.03722
Show all 34 observations
26 Jul 20230.00048
4 Aug 20230.00086
8 Sep 20230.00469
27 Sep 20230.00438
29 Dec 20230.00446
6 Jan 20240.00392
16 Jan 20240.00263
19 Feb 20240.00280
3 Mar 20240.00262
13 Mar 20240.00290
15 Apr 20240.00310
1 Jun 20240.00249
25 Jun 20240.00286
1 Aug 20240.00368
14 Aug 20240.00378
27 Aug 20240.00414
26 Nov 20240.00403
9 Dec 20240.00402
17 Dec 20240.00318
5 Jan 20250.00376
2 Feb 20250.00324
15 Feb 20250.00295
17 Mar 20250.37105
23 Mar 20250.43607
24 Mar 20250.37105
28 Mar 20250.43607
29 Mar 20250.78151
30 Mar 20250.43607
15 Apr 20250.59367
29 Jul 20250.53203
18 Nov 20250.43607
21 Nov 20250.53203
15 Jun 20260.0299
27 Jul 20260.03722

34 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.03722Published2023-07-26Index as of2026-07-27

The record had been public for 3 years when this index was last written.

Published 2023-07-26 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-27 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-798, use of hard-coded credentials. The index holds 1840 prior instances of this class, 12 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2020-8657matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2024-20439 · Cisco Smart License Utilitymatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-3272 · D-Link DNS-320Lmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-6448 · Unitronics VisiLogicmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-26138 · Atlassian Questions For Confluencematches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-44207matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

1840 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2023-38433.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.