vciy

CVE-2023-38096

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

NETGEAR ProSAFE Network Management System MyHandlerInterceptor Authentication Bypass Vulnerability

CVE-2023-380964 of 4 sources documented this
49

rank 49 = 21 + 25 + 1 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.82035  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-09-22  ·  without this subject the record ranks 48

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 47

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 49

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$4.09Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$4.09M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.82035 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.82035EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-09-22, 341 days at 0.82, as of 2026-08-29. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2023-28461SonicWall SonicOSConcurrentFortinet FortiOS,Fortinet FortiOSOracle Payments38096

This record is one instance of CWE-287, improper authentication. The index holds 4979 prior instances of this class, 49 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Scoring standard
ZdiCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running NETGEAR ProSAFE Network Management System? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-287 Improper Authenticationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-287: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Read Application Data, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchprosafe network management system 1.7.0.20receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA9.8 CRITICALreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.82035 · top 0.36% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byzdireceipt
Recorded changes15 · last 18 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productNETGEAR ProSAFE Network Management Systemreceipt
Published rangesnetgear prosafe network management system < 1.7.0.20receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionNETGEAR ProSAFE Network Management …CWE-287 improper authenticationFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-287data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

NETGEAR ProSAFE Network Management System MyHandlerInterceptor Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of NETGEAR ProSAFE Network Management System. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the MyHandlerInterceptor class. The issue results from improper implementation of the authentication mechanism. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the system. . Was ZDI-CAN-19718. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-287
affected versions
netgear prosafe network management system < 1.7.0.20

check it yourself zerodayinitiative.com kb.netgear.com receipt

Dated events

2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.00 to 0.762025-06-24EPSS moved 0.76 to 0.712026-06-15EPSS moved 0.75 to 0.83

Movement the material steps

3 May 20240.00047
17 Mar 20250.75506 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.83009 · scoring model v2026.06.15
29 Aug 20260.82035
Show all 15 observations
3 May 20240.00047
7 Feb 20250.00148
17 Mar 20250.75506
29 Mar 20250.79973
30 Mar 20250.75506
15 Apr 20250.74525
11 Jun 20250.76125
24 Jun 20250.70655
22 Sep 20250.74927
18 Nov 20250.75506
21 Nov 20250.74927
15 Jun 20260.83009
14 Jul 20260.81411
15 Jul 20260.81545
29 Aug 20260.82035

15 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.82035Published2024-05-03Index as of2026-08-29

The record had been public for 2 years, 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2024-05-03 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-29 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-287, improper authentication. The index holds 4979 prior instances of this class, 49 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-28461matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2024-53704 · SonicWall SonicOSmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-61882 · Oracle Concurrent Processingmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2022-40684 · Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy…matches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2020-12812 · Fortinet FortiOSmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2026-46817 · Oracle Paymentsmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

4979 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2023-38096.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.