vciy

CVE-2023-28840

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

moby/moby's dockerd daemon encrypted overlay network may be unauthenticated

CVE-2023-288404 of 4 sources documented this
27

rank 27 = 1 + 22 + 0 + 4 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.02559  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.7, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

2 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 23

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$91,700over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$91,700 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.7179585840212677 exposure x 0.02559 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.02559EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.5 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-04-05, 1251 days at 0.03, as of 2026-09-07. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CrushFTPCisco IOS XE28840

This record is one instance of CWE-420, unprotected alternate channel. The index holds 39 prior instances of this class, 2 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M7.5 HIGHreceipt
NVD8.7 HIGHreceipt
What it costs
GitHub_MComplete confidentiality loss; partial availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running moby? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality loss; partial availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-420 Unprotected Alternate Channel; CWE-636 Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-420: Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchmoby 20.10.24; moby 23.0.3receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.5 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.7 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.02559 · top 16% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes46 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productmobyreceipt
Published rangesmobyproject moby >= 1.12.0 < 20.10.24; mobyproject moby >= 23.0.0 < 23.0.3receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionmobyCWE-420 weaknessAdjacent componentsscope changeConfidentiality lossC:Hexploits CWE-420scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Moby is an open source container framework developed by Docker Inc. that is distributed as Docker, Mirantis Container Runtime, and various other downstream projects/products. The Moby daemon component (`dockerd`), which is developed as moby/moby, is commonly referred to as *Docker*. Swarm Mode, which is compiled in and delivered by default in dockerd and is thus present in most major Moby downstreams, is a simple, built-in container orchestrator that is implemented through a combination of SwarmKit and supporting network code. The overlay network driver is a core feature of Swarm Mode, providing isolated virtual LANs that allow communication between containers and services across the clust receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

er. This driver is an implementation/user of VXLAN, which encapsulates link-layer (Ethernet) frames in UDP datagrams that tag the frame with a VXLAN Network ID (VNI) that identifies the originating overlay network. In addition, the overlay network driver supports an optional, off-by-default encrypted mode, which is especially useful when VXLAN packets traverses an untrusted network between nodes. Encrypted overlay networks function by encapsulating the VXLAN datagrams through the use of the IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload protocol in Transport mode. By deploying IPSec encapsulation, encrypted overlay networks gain the additional properties of source authentication through cryptographic proof, data integrity through check-summing, and confidentiality through encryption. When setting an endpoint up on an encrypted overlay network, Moby installs three iptables (Linux kernel firewall) rules that enforce both incoming and outgoing IPSec. These rules rely on the u32 iptables extension provided by the xt_u32 kernel module to directly filter on a VXLAN packet's VNI field, so that IPSec guarantees can be enforced on encrypted overlay networks without interfering with other overlay networks or other users of VXLAN. Two iptables rules serve to filter incoming VXLAN datagrams with a VNI that corresponds to an encrypted network and discards unencrypted datagrams. The rules are appended to the end of the INPUT filter chain, following any rules that have been previously set by the system administrator. Administrator-set rules take precedence over the rules Moby sets to discard unencrypted VXLAN datagrams, which can potentially admit unencrypted datagrams that should have been discarded. The injection of arbitrary Ethernet frames can enable a Denial of Service attack. A sophisticated attacker may be able to establish a UDP or TCP connection by way of the container’s outbound gateway that would otherwise be blocked by a stateful firewall, or carry out other escalations beyond simple injection by smuggling packets into the overlay network. Patches are available in Moby releases 23.0.3 and 20.10.24. As Mirantis Container Runtime's 20.10 releases are numbered differently, users of that platform should update to 20.10.16. Some workarounds are available. Close the VXLAN port (by default, UDP port 4789) to incoming traffic at the Internet boundary to prevent all VXLAN packet injection, and/or ensure that the `xt_u32` kernel module is available on all nodes of the Swarm cluster.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-420; CWE-636; CWE-203; CWE-755
affected versions
mobyproject moby >= 1.12.0 < 20.10.24; mobyproject moby >= 23.0.0 < 23.0.3
also scored by
[email protected] 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

The CNA scored it 7.5 and NVD 8.7. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com github.com github.com github.com +4 morereceipt

Movement the material steps

5 Apr 20230.00044
17 Mar 20250.02087 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.02733 · scoring model v2026.06.15
7 Sep 20260.02559
Show all 46 observations
5 Apr 20230.00044
15 Apr 20230.00130
8 May 20230.00132
8 Jul 20230.00130
22 Aug 20230.00100
30 Aug 20230.00106
16 Sep 20230.00102
10 Oct 20230.00108
18 Oct 20230.00123
21 Nov 20230.00151
24 Dec 20230.00179
4 Mar 20240.00207
10 Apr 20240.00320
6 May 20240.00239
9 Jul 20240.00251
5 Aug 20240.00356
14 Sep 20240.00299
25 Oct 20240.00291
9 Nov 20240.00352
23 Nov 20240.00422
17 Dec 20240.00393
17 Mar 20250.02087
29 Mar 20250.01623
30 Mar 20250.02087
15 Apr 20250.00351
22 Apr 20250.00425
4 May 20250.00361
9 May 20250.00371
10 May 20250.00437
23 May 20250.00425
16 Aug 20250.00437
21 Aug 20250.00425
14 Oct 20250.00361
19 Oct 20250.00371
21 Oct 20250.00437
3 Nov 20250.00425
18 Nov 20250.02087
21 Nov 20250.00425
29 Jan 20260.00453
21 Mar 20260.00466
1 Apr 20260.00453
5 Apr 20260.00481
22 Apr 20260.00652
15 Jun 20260.02733
7 Aug 20260.0271
7 Sep 20260.02559

46 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.02559Published2023-04-04Index as of2026-09-07

The record had been public for 3 years, 5 months when this index was last written.

Published 2023-04-04 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-07 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-420, unprotected alternate channel. The index holds 39 prior instances of this class, 2 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-54309 · CrushFTPmatches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-20198 · Cisco IOS XE Softwarematches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

39 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

moby

Of the 2 records in this family, this is the only one whose title names be.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2023-28840.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.